i got this answer choice correct but im not sure why successful is negated ; i think its because initially successful is necessary and to make it sufficient yoiu have to negate; i know why prime purchasers is negated
- Joined
- Sep 2025
- Subscription
- Free
i sent you a DM . im down
hahahahahahaha. sad but true
Ive been trying to get on the site and cant get on. if i get the new 7 sage an i still have my original subscription
I just want to give a world wide shout out to Nicole Agrononik the 7 Sage tutor. Her teaching style of covering theory before practice has been a god sent to me and Im sure for everyone else. I am at a 92% for PSAr questions and I give the credit where its due. She explains things in a way that's easily understood. IDK who taught Nicole but I'm thankful for them too. I want to thank her mama for having her. I just watched her flaw factory class and I am telling you I thought I knew what I false dichotomy was and Hello. I didn't. So, I just want to give Nicole a hellafied praise for STL.
also is wed a good day for u
im having issues with the invitation
im down. what platform is the meeting on
im interested
i dont live in denver but i can study with you. i do not work saturdays and work full time also
Girl, I work 2 jobs and have a two year old . I have to work overtime to make ends meet. What you do is any free time you have devote it to LSAT. You have to give any free time you have to studying. During your lunch do a drill, listen to a class while you make dinner, or find a way to make time. There are no short cuts in this. If you only have one off day then use that time to study. You are just gonna have to find a way to make time. There isn't a magic gimmick to this. During down time at your job drill or listen to a class. The LSAC makes you work for it. If you're truly hungry for this then you will find a way.
Why can’t we have a class on just conditional chains?
I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
Count me in
PrepTest A - Section 1 - Question 21
I dont understand this question. I thought the flaw was making a generalization about one characteristic and placing the characteristic as a whole. Why isnt that right
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
im doing better in the first attempt than blind review; im not confident enough and i put the answer i felt it could possibly be and i was right the first time although im still doing terribly
PT 1997 S3 Q5
How do i stop talking myself out the wrong answer. i thought it was A but i chose the wrong an answer D
Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."
thats normal; keep practicing; i made a 142 times and 156 blind review ;