In Question #3, I took 'those months during several preceding and following years' as one grouped set of years vs two distinct groups of years, because there was no comma before the 'and', making it ambiguous. Isn't that what the whole Oxford comma issue was related to in the trucker contract suit several year back, and why the truckers won a 5MM settlement?

For example, did you catch the premise that was snuck into the sentence containing "therefore?"

Doesn't the above statement mean to say "did you catch the conclusion", since the sentence containing "therefore" also contains "likely"?

unless it's because the group 3 rule says that you pick either idea, negate that idea, then make it the sufficient condition. So, in the 2nd sentence, the first idea ("a kingdom will not support peaceable foreign policies") was chosen and negated = supp-fp-peace → benefit

If the 2nd idea had been chosen it would've read: /benefit →/supp-fp-peace

following

I've googled and have asked ChatGPT the same question and everything I'm reading is pointing to "the only" as a group 2 indicator, making the idea that follows the necessary condition.

Can someone explain this further?

#help

I'm also curious to understand why the chain starts with Sansa. Can someone please enlighten me? #help #feedback

Great explanation! Thank you!

I’m in Bucks and would love to join. WhatsApp is great for me.