I'm currently finishing up the last element of my applications for a few Canadian law schools, and I'm beginning to solicit advice from friends, family and strangers about the impact of my personal statement. One of my reviewers noted that I should clearly exhibit what I can offer to the school in my statement, and stray away from solely focusing on what draws me to the school.
I've written a personal statement for Thompson Rivers University (TRU) in Kamloops, BC, which closely adheres to their 'guidelines' for a statement, e.g. The law school is interested in 1). Your reasons for applying to law school 2). How you plan to use your law degree 3). Why you're interested in this school in particular and 4). Why you made certain academic or previous choices and how those choices affected your decision to apply to law school (readers familiar with UCalgary's personal statement requirements will notice these questions are rather familiar).
I've written a statement which I feel answers all of these questions clearly, drawing on my inspiration to attend law school gleaned through being involved in MUN and completing research on energy law and sustainability in my undergraduate degree. Furthermore, I have outlined what I plan to do with my law degree quite clearly as well. However, despite this, I cannot help but feeling like even after explaining my unique experience, motivations and career plans, I may have missed the mark in terms of illustrating "what makes [me] of particular interest to the Faculty of Law at Thompson Rivers University", especially after receiving this comment.
Does anybody have experience in this area and would like to weigh-in, or is willing to share (loosely) how they structured their statement?
@ You're right, there aren't any specific instructions on the website, but on the law application supplemental form, it explains that they are interested in learning about certain things, as I stated in the original post. I attempted to answer those 4 questions in addition to providing insights into my personality and strengths in the hope that they would then have a rounded impression of me. I kept employment and extracurriculars mostly out of my statement as well, but the supplemental form said this under the personal statement bit:
"The members of the Admissions Committee consider the Statement of Interest in the context of the rest of your application. Therefore it is useful for you to discuss how the
experiences you have listed elsewhere on your application are relevant to your desire to attend law school."
I tried to provide some context to particular relevant experiences I listed elsewhere as they related to my answers to the provided questions.
Certainly, I would love to read it. I'll send you a message.
@ Agreed, and that's what I attempted to do. It's much more persuasive and powerful when you can demonstrate an attribute instead of simply stating you have it. Thank you for your insight.