im unclear about the difference between premises and support. please help!
#help (Added by Admin)
@ said:
@ pray lol!
lmao i guess all I can do
@ said:
Ok, so a calm approach to timing and balance helped lift my score from -16 to -6/7. But from there, I began to intensely focus on the author. What is the author doing? What is their overall stance, but also, what is their stance on each part of the material they are giving me? THE AUTHOR HAS AN AGENDA. Know what it is.
For example, the author will droll on and on about how an artist crumbles and wrinkles and sprays canvas so that it embodies the blah blah blah--and then the author says "this ingenious innovation blah blah blah". There it is. The author finds that particular process of the artist's work ingeniously innovative. They may use less interesting language—-something like: this process presented a departure from previously explored techniques. When you see language like this, stop and reflect. You just got their motive. The author will tell you exactly what they think about the information they are presenting. You just have to stay undistracted by the jargon and dense material. When an author is going on and on about something, ask yourself: ok, so what is your point? Then, the moment they say that something was 'misguided', 'determined', 'had a shortcoming', 'premature'---BAM you know where they stand. Whats crazy about this too--when you have their motive, you can recall the dense details much easier. The author's motive becomes a framework for placing the rest of the material. In a very strange way, RC is closer to logic games than many think.
You are obviously skilled at this test--so just take your time and focus on the author.
Please reach out with any questions! Hope this helps!
You beautiful human! this is amazing. Just wondering, do you find any specific approach to any of the question types helpful? just looking for some last minute tips before my lsat!
Hey guys! now that I know we are allowed to use control F, i was wondering if anyone had any advice on how to use it most efficiently. I suppose that for RC explicitly states passages it would serve most helpful, but I am just wondering if anyone has found any other use to it?
Hey guys! does anyone know if converting one of these regular PT's into a flex will change the score alot? like i am getting 155-160 on them, but my worry is that the actual LSAT flex will give me a different score not representative of the one 7 sage gives
Anyone have any advice for reading comprehension? I have everything else down just missing that little piece
I had LR-RC-LG ... the LR seemed quite hard honestly, it was very difficult throughout, RC was pleasantly comprehensible, LG ON THE OTHER HAND IM SPEECHLESS ... the third game had the most questions AND was by far the hardest, it threw me in a loop.