User Avatar
nicole
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Note: Please bring your questions!

I'll be holding office hours this week, so come hang out with me! We can talk about the LSAT, law school, Fallout 4, Overwatch, brisket, butter, steak, etc.

To join, click the link below (at the appropriate time ;) ). Bring your questions on any LSAT topic and ask the Sage!

Office Hours with Nicole (8-10 PM ET Wednesday)

1. Please join my meeting.

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/382933861

2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.

Dial +1 (872) 240-3412

Access Code: 382-933-861

Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

Meeting ID: 382-933-861

User Avatar

Sunday, Oct 30 2016

nicole

Greetings from 1L

Hello friends. I am eyeballs deep in 1L. I just wanted to pop in and say that:

1) Law school is insane but insanely beautiful

2) Enjoy your life before law school (see #1)

Law school is all consuming but I often think of you all with the warmest of feelings. This is helpful as an alternative heat source as it is getting cold in Chicago.

<3 to all

[To view this post in our blog, follow this link]

For those of you taking the upcoming June administration of the LSAT or thinking ahead to future administrations, we'd like to share a few best practices/pro-tips to help ensure that you're in top shape heading into the exam. We've included some guidance for the week leading up to the exam as well as for Game Day itself.

Right up front, we'd like to say that you're not going to learn anything new the week before the exam. The hay is in the barn. You've already done the work that will carry you into the exam. Don't cram PT's; at most, do a few sections to keep your mechanics sharp. You need to make sure that you're fresh and in the right mindset for Game Day.

1) Between today and Sunday, go to bed and wake up at the same time every day (and this should be the same time you'll need to wake up for the June exam). Waking up ~3 hours before the earliest time you're likely to start the test (as soon as 30 minutes after the show-up time) will help ensure that your cortisol levels are up and that you're fully awake. Waking up at this time during this week and Monday June 6th helps to ensure that you'll be tired enough to go to bed Sunday night. Also, no screens/blue light after 10pm. This will help ensure that you're not artificially stimulating cortisol (waking yourself up) before bed.

2) Pre-hydrate. Drink a 3-4 liters of water every day of the week before the test. It's really not that big of a deal to drink that much water, and doing so will ensure that you are well hydrated the morning of without having to drink much (if any) liquid.

3) Practice your game day routine at least twice. This means wake up at the time you'll wake up on Monday, eat the exact same breakfast/lunch you plan for game day. Keep track of what you eat and drink and when you do it. Track your hunger, thirst, and bathroom need levels (just like in The Sims). Pro-tip: if you need to go at 2PM, there's a very strong likelihood that if you follow the same plan/timing, you will need to go in the middle of a section. Which is what we want to avoid.

4) Day of, general: Don't do anything differently from your dress rehearsals. No magic pills. No extra coffee. No tricks. No surprises. Perhaps get to the test center early and just go for a walk around the grounds if feasible. You might see some very nervous folks in crisis mode. Disregard. You are not them.

5) Day of, warm up: Whatever you do, don't score anything. And don't do any new material. Maybe take a handful of LR Q's, maybe one easy game, maybe one easy RC. Just chill out about it. You're just warming up your mechanics.

6) Day of, during the break: People will try to talk to you because they are nervous or want reassurance. You are not there to be anyone's friend. You are not there to be anyone's therapist or life coach. However you put up your personal "Do Not Disturb" status—just don't let anyone throw you off your game.

June '16 Pep Rally! Featuring JY Ping and Nicole Hopkins | Friday 8pm ET

Come for the encouragement. Come for the power. Come for the pro-tips. One of our most popular events, we want to pump you up and answer any lingering questions you may have about the June administration of the LSAT.

Clear eyes. Full hearts. Can't lose.

To join, please do the following:

Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

United States +1 (571) 317-3112

Access Code: 219-480-381

User Avatar
nicole
Wednesday, Jun 29 2016

@ Thanks, guys! I am leaning toward keeping the score.

@

good point about retaking to get off the waitlist. That would be what, the February exam? June?

I'd be very surprised to see you waitlisted. Make sure your app isn't mediocre. You are up against the best of the best and scores are merely a necessary but never a sufficient condition for top schools.

User Avatar
nicole
Wednesday, Jul 27 2016

@

said:

Do the top scorers avoid subvocalization?

Not at all.

User Avatar
nicole
Friday, Oct 25 2019

WAY too kind. This woman is a rockstar, by the way! Love you all, always happy to do a quick "hello" over Skype :)

User Avatar
nicole
Monday, Jul 25 2016

Great opportunity to meet AdComm members and get someone's business card (for follow up emails etc.).

Hey 7sagers,

This Wednesday, July 27, at 9 pm ET, Charlie Melman (@cmelman95 ) will host a webinar in which he’ll tell you how—and how not—to increase your score from the middle of the pack to the 99th percentile.

Charlie studied for the LSAT from September, 2015 to June, 2016, and along the way he learned a lot about the test, how to study for each section, how learning works in general, and—perhaps most importantly—how to manage YOURSELF through the arduous study process.

He’ll talk about the bad things he did, the good things he did, and how he approached every section. Drop by on July 27 at 9 pm ET, and he’ll be happy to take all questions!

154 to 173: A Tale of Logic and Games. Jul 27, 2016 at 9:00 PM EDT.

https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/591127429

2. Or, call in using your telephone.

Dial +1 (312) 757-3121

Access Code: 591-127-429

Yes—it's happening AGAIN!

Our very own @"J.Y. Ping" will be hosting BR Group for PT62 on Sunday. This should be fun.

You obviously don't want to miss this.

Sunday, May 29th at 8PM ET: PT62

Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

United States +1 (571) 317-3112

Access Code: 219-480-381

Note:

  • For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as you are able on your own; then join us for all or part of the call—everyone is welcome.
  • Note: For the purposes of the call, we like to check our group blind review score together at the very end of the call :) So at least don't say ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” KEEP THE CORRECT ANSWER TO YOURSELF. Win the argument with your reasoning.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • This will be our second-to-last PT meeting before the Pep Rally (6/3)!

    Get excited.

    Saturday, May 28th at 8PM ET: PT75

    Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

    Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

    You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

    United States +1 (571) 317-3112

    Access Code: 219-480-381

    Note:

  • For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as you are able on your own; then join us for all or part of the call—everyone is welcome.
  • Note: For the purposes of the call, we like to check our group blind review score together at the very end of the call :) So at least don't say ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” KEEP THE CORRECT ANSWER TO YOURSELF. Win the argument with your reasoning.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • User Avatar
    nicole
    Sunday, Jul 24 2016

    @

    said:

    I'd really appreciate some advice.

    Have you had a consult with Spivey? They are very good about telling folks if they don't need a consultant.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Sunday, Jul 24 2016

    @.gill.sanford are you a middle class straight white woman? If so, tread carefully with the DS, unless it is required for your application.

    Wow, amen!

    @.gill.sanford but if you are squarely a majority culture person who writes a diversity statement about your personal experiences that have little connection to systemic inequity, you run the risk of coming off tone deaf about the values inherent in diversity.

    Here's the nail. Here's a hammer. Here's how to hit it on the head.

    Public Interest Careers & Resources with Sage Allison

    Thursday 5/26 at 8pm ET

    We're excited to announce that Sage Allison (HLS '19) will be hosting a special webinar to share information and resources for those who are interested in Public Interest careers. If you're even remotely considering this line of legal work, please join us for this special event!

    To join the webinar, please do the following:

    Public Interest Careers & Resources with Sage Allison

    Thu, May 26, 2016 8pm ET

    Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/452326133

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States +1 (872) 240-3212

    Access Code: 452-326-133

    Note on all webinars: Only the live webinars are free and open to the public. No recordings will be made publicly available, but we do make webinar recordings available to 7sage's students as part of the paid course. So if you want to get some great webinar content for free, be sure to attend the live version. Furthermore, any recording or broadcasting of webinars is strictly prohibited (Periscope, screencapture, etc.) and constitutes a violation of LSAC's copyright. Copyright infringement is not a good way to start a legal career.

    Argument Part/Method of Reasoning with Sage Jimmy Dahroug

    Friday 5/27 at 8pm ET

    Sage Jimmy (173) will be leading an intensive on Argument Part/Method of Reasoning questions this week. Y'all requested these types in particular so be sure to join us for this webinar! Jimmy loves these Q's so he's looking forward to imparting some of that enthusiasm to you all.

    To join the webinar, please do the following:

    AP/MOR

    Fri, May 27, 2016 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM CDT

    Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/165375093

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States +1 (872) 240-3212

    Access Code: 165-375-093

    Note on all webinars: Only the live webinars are free and open to the public. No recordings will be made publicly available, but we do make webinar recordings available to 7sage's students as part of the paid course. So if you want to get some great webinar content for free, be sure to attend the live version. Furthermore, any recording or broadcasting of webinars is strictly prohibited (Periscope, screencapture, etc.) and constitutes a violation of LSAC's copyright. Copyright infringement is not a good way to start a legal career.

    My 18 Point Increase Story, Updated (with Sage Nicole Hopkins)

    Monday 6/20 8pm ET

    You asked for it—this Monday I'll be sharing [updated with T14 acceptance and scholarship!!] insights from my epic 1.5 year journey from a 152 diagnostic. This webinar is appropriate for all levels of prep. I'll share the good, the bad, the ugly, and the burnout—and the goal is to help you avoid some mistakes I made as well as highlight some best practices I've collected along the way. Bring your questions!

    To join the webinar, please do the following:

    My 18 Point Increase Story, Updated (with Sage Nicole Hopkins)

    Mon, Jun 20, 2016 8pm ET

    Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/335242437

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States +1 (872) 240-3212

    Access Code: 335-242-437

    Note on all webinars: Only the live webinars are free and open to the public. No recordings will be made publicly available, but we do make webinar recordings available to 7sage's students as part of the paid course. So if you want to get some great webinar content for free, be sure to attend the live version. Furthermore, any recording or broadcasting of webinars is strictly prohibited (Periscope, screencapture, etc.) and constitutes a violation of LSAC's copyright. Copyright infringement is not a good way to start a legal career.

    Getting pretty close to June and a wee bit closer to September.

    Never fear! Guided BR Group is here.

    Saturday, May 21st at 8PM ET: PT74

    Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

    Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

    You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

    United States +1 (571) 317-3112

    Access Code: 219-480-381

    Note:

  • For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as you are able on your own; then join us for all or part of the call—everyone is welcome.
  • Note: For the purposes of the call, we like to check our group blind review score together at the very end of the call :) So at least don't say ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” KEEP THE CORRECT ANSWER TO YOURSELF. Win the argument with your reasoning.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • User Avatar

    Tuesday, May 17 2016

    nicole

    Does it ring a bell? [RC QT's]

    Listen to this as background music for this post:

    Hey guys,

    I want to share a method that I use in RC and that I have been teaching several of my students recently. RC is at least in certain instances designed to test your short term memory. To that end, there's a question type that seems to be designed to do exactly that. I've collected a few examples and have a method to recommend for approaching these questions.

  • The passage asserts which of the following about X?
  • The passage provides sufficient information to answer which of the following questions?
  • The passage mentions which of the following about/as a component of X?
  • In the passage, the author says which of the following about X?
  • Which of the following is a characteristic about X mentioned in the passage/in both passages?
  • According to the passage, which of the following is an essential property of/attribute of X?
  • Here's what I do with these questions.

    1. Jump right into the answer choices.
  • For each AC, I ask: "Does this ring a bell?"
  • If it doesn't ring a bell, I either move on quickly or mark it with an X (do not mark the answer choice out necessarily—we are just testing each AC to see if it rings a bell or not)
  • If it rings a bell, put a checkmark next to the AC. "Yep, that rings a bell."
  • Typically 4 AC's will NOT ring a bell because they just weren't in the passage and therefore not available in my short term memory bank.
  • In the case where 2 seem to ring a bell, look for something concrete and specific in one of the AC's that you can quickly locate in the passage and thereby either confirm or eliminate. For instance, proper names, "some scientists," dates, key terms, etc.
  • Most of the time, only one AC rings a bell. And that's the right answer (barring hallucinations/clear over-inferences/reasons to eliminate an AC. I don't think I've ever had an AC that truly rang a bell that ended up being wrong).

    Try this out for this QT and see where you end up. By focusing on what LSAC is testing on these QT's, you avoid the pitfalls of wasting time and misdirecting energy.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Sunday, Jul 17 2016

    @

    said:

    I feel like the skill needed to improve on RC questions can be gained by doing Main Point questions

    Really? Go on.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Aug 16 2016

    @

    said:

    Any advice?!

    RC Arguments are cookie cutters! Learn the argument patterns that recur. Forget subject matter. It's all about argument.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Jul 13 2016

    @

    said:

    So I was thinking... that I could take a timed LR section at lunch, then blind review it in the evenings when I get off work 1-2 times a week.

    I like this idea! This is very similar to what I have had students of mine do in the past.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Monday, Jul 11 2016

    They don't care about bands. Only reported scores since that's how they compute their medians :D

    It's happening again!

    You obviously don't want to miss this.

    Sunday, May 15th at 8PM ET: PT54

    Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

    Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

    You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

    United States +1 (571) 317-3112

    Access Code: 219-480-381

    Note:

  • For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as you are able on your own; then join us for all or part of the call—everyone is welcome.
  • Note: For the purposes of the call, we like to check our group blind review score together at the very end of the call :) So at least don't say ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” KEEP THE CORRECT ANSWER TO YOURSELF. Win the argument with your reasoning.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • So you want to do BR group for PT73.

    That's pretty much how it's gonna be. I'll be the Smithers to your Mr. Burns. How should you feel about that?

    Saturday, May 14th at 8PM ET: PT73

    Click here to join this conversation: https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/219480381

    Please click the link and comment if you plan on participating.

    You can also dial in to the BR call by using your phone.

    United States +1 (571) 317-3112

    Access Code: 219-480-381

    Note:

  • For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as you are able on your own; then join us for all or part of the call—everyone is welcome.
  • Note: For the purposes of the call, we like to check our group blind review score together at the very end of the call :) So at least don't say ... "No guys, really, it's D, I checked it.” KEEP THE CORRECT ANSWER TO YOURSELF. Win the argument with your reasoning.
  • These groups work best when folks from ALL stages of prep and with all different goals join in! Not just for "super-preppers" and definitely not just for the casual LSATer (does such a person exist?).
  • The only expectation anyone has for these calls is for you to have fun and ask questions as you desire. We are just a bunch of LSAT lovers who gather via GoToMeeting and intellectually slaughter each test.
  • Pseudo-Sufficient Assumptions with Sage Jimmy Dahroug

    Friday 5/13 at 8pm ET

    Sage Jimmy (173) will be leading an intensive on PSA questions (sometimes called "Supporting Principle" questions). There's been a lot of buzz about this question type recently so be sure to tune in!

    To join the webinar, please do the following:

    Pseudo-Sufficient Assumptions with Sage Jimmy Dahroug

    Fri, May 13, 2016 8:00 PM ET

    Please join my meeting from your computer, tablet or smartphone.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/614923157

    You can also dial in using your phone.

    United States +1 (872) 240-3212

    Access Code: 614-923-157

    Note on all webinars: Only the live webinars are free and open to the public. No recordings will be made publicly available, but we do make webinar recordings available to 7sage's students as part of the paid course. So if you want to get some great webinar content for free, be sure to attend the live version. Furthermore, any recording or broadcasting of webinars is strictly prohibited (Periscope, screencapture, etc.) and constitutes a violation of LSAC's copyright. Copyright infringement is not a good way to start a legal career.

    Hey y'all—

    Just popping in from 1L land per @DumbHollywoodActor 's request to share some thoughts about 1L prep—specifically, Larry Law Law's KTCOOLS course. I started Larry's course around this time last year and I don't think it's too early to start thinking about this. Here goes.

  • I have one of the highest GPA's in my entire class (I know of one person with a 4.01, I have a 3.975) and (to the best of my knowledge) the highest GPA for doctrine classes. We have a graded legal writing course, which your school probably will not. So, for all of the courses relevant to Larry's course, I may have the highest GPA at a T10 law school. I got an A+ in Crim and A's in Torts, Contracts, and Civ Pro.
  • I did this well because I didn't waste my time/energy on things that didn't matter and managed my expectations. Your grades in doctrine classes depend almost exclusively on your performance in a 3-4 hour period one day in December/April. I didn't brief cases (I have a very specific method of "book briefing" which I'm happy to share with you all over the summer) and I did practice exams early and often (not full exams but hypos that are ~45min to 1 hour, which typically represents the amount of time you will spend on an individual section/fact pattern on a law school exam; full exams you do during reading period and they should be exams your professor has released).
  • These principles (not briefing cases/book briefing and approach to PE's) I learned from Larry's course. Everything you will learn in law school is to the contrary: they will tell you to brief cases and hold off on PE's until reading period. I promise that you will have no idea how to take a law school exam unless/until you're exposed to them, ideally early on and in a context with some guidance. And I promise that briefing cases is a waste of time as far as exams are concerned. Book briefing is another matter, but writing out full briefs is, in my opinion, madness. It will make you miserable and you will get nothing for all of your effort.
  • People thought I was crazy. My study group thought I was crazy. That's because when you get to law school, the administration and mentors etc. will tell you to brief cases and wait to practice taking exams. Do not do these things.

    So—I learned all of the things that I think differentiated me from KTCOOLS. I'm not saying it's sufficient/necessary, but that's where I got the ideas for how/what I did.

    My personal tips include: take all of your notes by hand, don't have your computer or phone out in class, and start outlining by the middle of the semester. First-pass outlining is typing your notes. Real outlining (what you will actually use on the exam) you do at the end of the semester. And make all of your own outlines. The reason you outline is to master the material. Use A or A+ outlines from upperclassmen who had your professors only to supplement your own or to get ideas. Only use supplements if 1) they are written by your professor 2) the professor recommends (rare) and/or 3) to get enough of the law internalized to do hypos early on. Be warned that supplements will almost definitely lead you astray with at least a couple of your professors, so you may need to "forget" what you learned in order to practice exam taking when it comes to what your professor actually teaches. But that is a small price to pay for the experience of taking practice exams, refining your methods, and getting used to legal analysis under timed conditions.

    I'm not going to have time to address specific questions/comments, but much love to all :D Dave knows where to find me and he can bring important questions to my attention, but for now, I'm signing off and thinking of you all very fondly.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Aug 09 2016

    @ Like a 7Sage convention. 7Con? SageCon? That would rule.

    Well it'd be in Chicago :D

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Saturday, Jul 09 2016

    @

    said:

    Do you always split your game board when there are only two options for a slot? Seems like I see JY doing that most of the time.

    My assumption is always "how will I split the boards" as opposed to "will I split these boards."

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Saturday, Jul 09 2016

    @

    said:

    I don't know what this means but just for kicks:

    Yes!

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Monday, Aug 08 2016

    We are so adorbs!

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Friday, Jul 08 2016

    @

    said:

    Anyways, I'm just wondering if there are people out there who have done so on the actual test by using 7sage.

    Yep--Plenty of us, anyone with the title of "Sage" scored above 170 (and all of us were 7Sagers).

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Aug 08 2017

    @ said:

    It seems to me that there are two possibilities here.

    The LSAT is no better than the GRE at predicting law school success. This seems like a stunning failure. A specifically designed test for law school aptitude is no better at predicting law school success than a generic test which basically tests high school reading and math ability. How can this be? Is it our fault? Have people like us ruined the validity of the LSAT by studying for it like a job? Or was it never valid to begin with? That has to be an indictment of the people at LSAC? It is also kind of shocking to me since it feels like thevskills tested on the LSAT would be useful in the study of the law.

    The other option is that the LSAT is better at predicting law school success than the GRE. If this is the case, then Harvard and Northwestern have either just made dramatic mistakes or are deliberately sacraficing the quality of their incoming classes in a sinister play to claw their way back up the rankings.

    Actually, GRE scores as of yet will not be reported to US News. So either they replace all the low LSAT people with GRE people to inflate the rankings (unlikely—NU is quite reverse-splitter friendly as a complement to being splitter-friendly; they need high GPA people to offset low GPA/high LSAT people), to your point, or they (what I think is much more likely) admit candidates on an extremely selective basis without LSAT.

    My prediction is that, unless US News changes its rankings algorithms to account for GRE score, HLS and NU will admit very few GRE-only folks. But the option will be there to make exceptions for exceptional candidates, likely with very high GPA's (again because we need high GPA's).

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Aug 08 2017

    @ said:

    The ABA Council is currently reviewing its standards in regards to mandatory standardized tests required for law school admissions. ... In the end, we are optimistic that they will allow law schools greater flexibility in the admissions process, to the benefit of students, schools, and the profession alike.

    Whoa! Does this mean that they are considering doing away with a requirement for any standardized test, and that Dean Rodriguez is optimistic that they will give law schools this flexibility?

    No—standardized testing is necessary due to the wide variation between universities and majors and GPA standards.

    Hey y'all,

    We got an email from Dean Rodriguez this morning that provides in relevant part:

    At Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, we are firmly committed to meeting the evolving needs of the profession, and this means constantly evaluating the law school experience. ... With this in mind, starting in Fall 2018, Northwestern Law will allow JD applicants to submit either the Graduate Record Examination (GRE) or the Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) for admission the following year (Fall 2019).

    The GRE is a holistic exam that comprehensively evaluates qualitative and quantitative skills and is broadly accepted by thousands of graduate and professional degree programs, from biochemistry to public policy to philosophy. Gaining access to GRE test-takers, many of whom are engineers, scientists, and mathematicians, could benefit Northwestern Law and the legal profession at large by diversifying the applicant pool. Additionally, the GRE is offered a number of times throughout the year and in locations worldwide, making it easily accessible for prospective students.

    This decision was made after careful evaluation, including a study conducted in conjunction with the Educational Testing Service (ETS), the organization that administers the GRE. In accordance with the American Bar Association (ABA) Standards for Legal Education, the study assessed whether the GRE is a valid predictor of first-year academic performance at Northwestern Law. Results showed that the GRE is in fact a strong predictor of first-year performance at Northwestern.

    The ABA Council is currently reviewing its standards in regards to mandatory standardized tests required for law school admissions. ... In the end, we are optimistic that they will allow law schools greater flexibility in the admissions process, to the benefit of students, schools, and the profession alike.

    Hopefully this will be of some encouragement and not distract you from your LSAT studies. LSAT remains the best preparation for the skills you need to succeed in law school. One of the reasons I've done well is because I'm super fast at assessing arguments and articulating assumptions: two skills you will not get from the GRE on its own. Also note that our JD-MBA program already accepts GMAT exclusively.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Jul 06 2016

    @.quertermous Will this video be recorded and posted onto the website? I have to work during this time, but I would really love to hear the thoughts and ideas, Nicole! :)

    Nope.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Jul 05 2016

    @ Most admissions experts I've read have said a better score will ALWAYS do more for you than applying early.

    100%

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Tuesday, Jul 05 2016

    @ hey

    @

    quick question if you knew whether the Spivey Consulting Webinar was going to be posted or not ?

    Sorry, that particular webinar is lost to the world at this point due to technical issues. The original webinar is on our Youtube page!

    From our LSAT Blog: https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-final-stretch-encouraging-quotes/

    For this final installment of LSAT Final Stretch leading up to the June exam, we've asked some of our Mentors and Sages for any final words of encouragement for those of you taking the exam (or looking forward to future administrations).

    Mentor Sam: "You got this!" "You're almost there!" "Last minute advice: Stay focused and do your best. You've come this far, and you're only a few steps away from the finish line.”

    Mentor Nilesh, Georgetown University Law Center '18: “I know it can seem impossible... but never give up hope. Logic Games only clicked definitively for me in the last week after a year and a half of prep and even more so in the last 4 days...keep working...and do not give up!”

    Mentor Josh: “The LSAT doesn't happen in a testing room on test day. It happens the months and years before test day. It happens during core curriculum as we slog through the information and slowly achieve mastery. It happens during drilling as we reinforce and solidify that mastery. It happens during PTs and JY videos and fool proofing games; and during the times when we inevitably get knocked down, when a bad PT shakes us, when we realize we have further to go than we thought; and it happens when we get back up and keep fighting. So what is test day? It is not the LSAT. You have already conquered the LSAT. Test day is simply the dropping of your score in the mail. Y'all got this.”

    Mentor Alejandro: “Trust your instincts. Find serenity in the fact that you studied your hardest up until this point. Oh and don't be afraid to skip!”

    Mentor Brittany: “Good luck on the test everyone!! We did all the hard work already!!! Let's go crush this thing!!!”

    Sage Allison, Harvard Law School '19: “You've already put in so many hours on this test. In a real sense, the hard work is behind you. June 6th is your opportunity to demonstrate your understanding of the LSAT, and regardless of your nerves, you are equipped. You can do this!”

    Let me be the final person to say ... YOU GOT THIS

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Oct 05 2016

    @ please expand

    So basically as you move down within that range, you're getting into regional territory and you really need to be careful about biglaw/clerkship numbers outside of, frankly, the T13. It's a complicated calculus regarding the curve and placement statistics as well as minimum GPA requirements firms maintain for different schools. A 3.3 may get you placement at Firm X from School B, ranked 10th, whereas that same firm requires a 3.7 from School C, ranked 25th.

    Note: Please bring your questions!

    I'll be offering free Office Hours this week! Join me for any and all LSAT or law school-related questions (we will also have a brisket Q&A for interested parties).

    To join, click the link below (at the appropriate time ;) ). Bring your questions on any LSAT topic and ask the Sage!

    Office Hours with Nicole (7-9 PM ET Thursday)

    1. Please join my meeting.

    https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/382933861

    2. Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended. Or, call in using your telephone.

    Dial +1 (872) 240-3412

    Access Code: 382-933-861

    Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting

    Meeting ID: 382-933-861

    Facebook instructions

    Folks—if your submissions are on Facebook, please send me screenshots of them via email within 24 hours of contest end (nicole at 7sage.com). Pretty please! We can see all Twitter and Instagram posts but Facebook is quite tricky.

    7sagers—

    To kick off our summer of LSAT love, we’re holding a photo contest. Here’s how you can enter and what you can win.

    1) Take a picture of yourself studying, yourself using the 7sage app (on mobile/iPad or laptop/desktop), your awesome LSAT study space … Anything LSAT and 7sage related! (Please note: make sure not to have LSAT questions in the video so as to avoid copyright issues)

    2) Post it on social media (Twitter, Instagram, or our Facebook page) with the following hashtags: #LSAT, #7sage and mention @7sagelsat (Twitter) or @7sage (IG). Note: You must also be following 7sage (Twitter/IG) and/or like our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/7sagelsat/) in order to be eligible.

    3) Recruit your social media followers to like/share your post

    There are 9 prizes available: 3 for most Instagram likes, 3 for most Twitter retweets, and 3 for most Facebook shares. The top 3 entries for each category will receive the following, respectively:

    1) Grand Prize ($50 Amazon GC + a special piece of 7sage merchandise of your choice)

    2) Awesome Prize ($25 Amazon GC + a special piece of 7sage merchandise of your choice)

    3) Excellent Prize (7sage power block—charges your cell phone or tablet, excellently)

    So get out the selfie sticks … it’s time to shine!

    All entries must be posted by June 21st at 11:59pm ET

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Oct 05 2016

    I got into NU with a Feb score. Apply with your best score. You never get a second chance to make a first impression.

    Seriously though--I know like <10 people with 170+ scores here at NU.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Oct 05 2016

    @

    said:

    18--30 range ranking

    That's a wild range. Outside of T14, the conversation changes. 18-30? It's an even riskier conversation.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Oct 05 2016

    Well I applied on the deadline to NU and here I am. Don't overestimate the when-to-apply theories.

    User Avatar
    nicole
    Wednesday, Oct 05 2016

    1L is harder than LSAT just saying ... Would trade 10/10 ...

    User Avatar

    Friday, Jun 03 2016

    nicole

    The Final Fistbump

    Hey you.

    You taking the LSAT on Saturday?

    Come back here. You're taking it, aren't you?

    Ok. Lots of folks around here are, too.

    How ya feelin'?

    I know that feel.

    Here's how it's gonna go.

    1) LG's gonna throw a thing at you that you're like—wait, what? OH. Please. That's nothing. LOL. Really LG, nice try on that twist there. Nice try.

    This is you when LG tries to throw a twist:

    2) RC's gonna have some weird subject matter. But we don't change the way we read based on subject matter, do we? No. We don't. We know all RC is the same damn cookie cutter business and that we're always reading for reasoning structure.

    We know RC is all like this:

    So you are gonna devour RC like this:

    You're gonna get about ankle-deep in a couple of time sink questions. YOU WILL NOT give in to timesink temptations. You will remember that no one RC question is worth more than a minute of our time.

    But you're gonna see that you're in the mud and you're gonna get the hell outta there and skip-skip-skip away. When in doubt ...

    3) LR's might feel kinda weird at first. Time warp-y. Trippy. You might feel like a couple of the first few questions are hard (and they might actually be hard questions).

    At first with LR you might feel like this:

    But then you're gonna summon the Huntress.

    Oh shit.

    She's HERE.

    I think you know what this means for LR. LR's gonna get taken down hard. Like, 25-in-25 hard. Sitting around with nothing to DO for 3 minutes hard.

    Once the Huntress is summoned, she is on the hunt. Here is what the Huntress does with her prey.

    Are you the Huntress?

    I SAID ARE YOU THE HUNTRESS.

    YES YOU ARE.

    NOW GO CRUSH THIS TEST.

    From our blog post here (just in case you haven't seen it yet!): https://classic.7sage.com/lsat-final-stretch-withdraw-cancel-or-conquer/

    When to Withdraw

    If you’re confident that you have not reached your LSAT potential or still have major milestones to overcome in your LSAT journey, then withdraw from the test.

    Never, ever, ever waste a take. Many of us here who have LSAT success stories needed all three of our takes to get to the triumphant chapter. Assume that you will likely be in the same situation.

    To put things in more concrete terms: take the average of your last 3 PT scores. If this score is more than 3 points below your minimum goal score, you should think about withdrawing.

    If you’re seriously ill, have had recent personal drama (not related to the LSAT), or have major life changes going on (particularly that are out of your control), also consider that you might be better off withdrawing. We have heard many stories of folks who decided to take the test instead of respecting the realities of personal upheaval. Few of those stories had happy endings, and most of those folks wished they’d taken a step back from the LSAT at that time.

    Do not take the test "just to see how it goes." Do not take the test "just to get experience." Only take the LSAT when you are good and ready.

    When to Cancel Your Score

    Fact: Everyone feels awful after they take the test. Expect that you will too. The worst thing for you to do is to obsess over all of the questions you weren’t sure about or how you could have diagrammed that game more effectively. And don't discuss the test with anyone else—both to preserve the integrity of the administration per LSAC's guidelines, and to preserve your sanity. It’s over, and you did your best.

    It’s important to say that up front, because feeling icky after that test is not a reasonable grounds for cancelling your score.

    There are three conditions that warrant score cancellation, and only three.

    —You are certain you had a bubbling error from which you were not able to recover. For instance, realizing that you started bubbling at #2 and were therefore one off for every answer in that section. If you are certain that this happened, then you should cancel your score.

    —You had a medical emergency during the test, such as: an asthma attack, seizure, blackout, full-blown panic attack, etc. This list of conditions sounds extreme, because you should only cancel your score if something truly extreme happened.

    —You had to leave the testing room for any reason and were not done with the section. If this happened for any reason, then this may be an serious enough condition for you to cancel you score.

    Again, please note that feeling bad about how you did is not grounds to cancel your score.

    How to Know You’re Ready

    A combination of these three conditions is necessary for you to go forth and conquer this upcoming LSAT:

    —Your PT average is within 3 points of your goal score

    —You’ve done due diligence in your prep and have not neglected any major difficulty

    —You do not meet any of the criteria noted in the “withdraw” section above

    You may not feel perfectly ready. Almost no one does! But if you’ve done your part and your performance indicates readiness, then let us be the first to say: YOU GOT THIS.

    Confirm action

    Are you sure?