The Disney argument is the strongest because the structure of the premises help validate the conclusion. The Tiger argument comes second because its premises hold truth that we can validate the conclusion to an extent. The detective argument is the weakest as it leaves room for many flaws, for example Mr. Fat cat could have been licking his paw for many other reasons or the trash can could of been knocked over by someone else.

Tiger: My friend prefers an electrical vehicle over a gas fueled vehicle. All in all, they are the more economically friendly choice.

Disney: Stan enjoys treating himself to an expensive item once a week only if he meets his work sales quota. This week dan left work feeling extremely sad but he did end up purchasing that watch he was looking at last week. Therefore Stan must of met his work sales quota.

Interested!