Can someone link the negation lesson? #admin

Ok so I called the LSAT helpline just now to ask about this - IT'S TRUE. WE CAN USE COMMAND F.

Seems incredible but true.

In case this helps anyone (I learned this from another prep course I took): Whenever you see the words "takes for granted that" you can replace this with "assumes."

Therefore answer choice A would read: "Assumes" that all religious music is inspiring.

We know this is NOT the case. The critic does not make this claim in the stimulus. He simply says Vierne's work is divinely inspiring, not that all music is inspiring.

Could you share what this looked like?

Realized I misread the question stem and was trying to strengthen Eva's argument. Oops!

I was just about to say this - I thought concurred meant disagreed facepalm

In answer choice C, how does "an action" translate to "a means?"