I would love to join! Pls send the link!

I would love this!!

for question 8 wouldnt the third paragraph - in which the paragraph starts of by saying /another clue' be the author saying this - so wouldnt that mean the author is forthright advocating for Olsens view?

I was stuck on D too (like many of the people in the comments) but I think I understand now why D is wrong: the intended purpose of a legislation (what it was meant to do) does not necessarily play a role in how it should be. Your intention for what you want something to do is not necessarily how it SHOULD be. For example, car manufacturers meant to make the new car be able to drive extremely fast. however, the car can only drive at a normal speed, so the car is driving as it should. Not sure if this is the best analogy but it made sense to me lol!

im interested pls message me !