I think it could actually be really useful and helpful when it comes to timing, as well as reducing confusion on the test. When you're scanning answer choices and determining your correct answer choice, I think parsing out the domain and/or other pieces like the rule, can be quite helpful because you're distilling the argument and honing in on the most essential parts of it for your understanding (and making it more simple/less convoluted). If the domain is "HBO Max Subscribers," and you have an answer choice that mentions being a Netflix Subscriber, then you know that is not it. Instead of having to go back and re-read, you are cutting down on wasted time, and confusion. It won't be as simple as that on the LSAT, unfortunately, and that's why this is helpful (in my opinion!).

That is also what I did also. I have also noticed on the skill builders that, following the rules laid out in the lessons, my original translations are what the answers say is the contrapositive. I guess it doesn't really matter because the statements are equivalent in meaning, but I don't understand why my "default" is typically the other way around.

Thank you!!

How is "Only force users can be Jedi" the equivalent of all those statements? Is it because "can" denotes possibility, but not necessity? I am confused. If I put the a dot outside of the Jedi circle, but inside the Force circle, then "Only force users can be (something else that isn't Jedi)," right? Can someone clarify this one statement for me.