#help Is conditional logic only able to indicate association/correlation but never causation?
#help I understand how answer choice (E) is correct but I feel that the argument is vulnerable to criticism that it fails to consider answer choice (B) as well because if "card games are among the most difficult cognitive tasks one can attempt to perform" then maybe the card game is just extremely difficult and both age sets failed because of this extreme difficulty and that is why there was no difference between the two sets in their abilities. Therefore, I believe that answer choice (B) would still be a failed consideration. I know I am 100% wrong because the test never puts two correct answer choices but I just need someone to destroy my justification because I don't want to make this mistake again. Thanks!
#help Which lessons in the syllabus cover logical errors such as answer choices A and B? I got this question right during timed conditions but I was not able to quickly identify this attribute about those two answer choices being cookie-cutter logical errors.
I just saw it was EST time zone and cannot get out of my prior arrangement. I hope you do this again because would love the chance to hear your wisdom on the test.
I just took my diagnostic test and scored a 158, I am planning on taking the test in April. I'm also in the same time zone, so I would be down.
Im interested as well! Scoring in high 150s, looking to break 165 before April.
#help Could someone explain or tell me what lesson goes over negating claims like "always"; I chose answer choice (B) because I had negated "always" to "never". I didn't know whether or not it was improper of me to negate "always" to "never" or if that is acceptable to do so? Or if the correct negation of "always" is to be "usually" instead of
"never"?
Im interested if not too late!
Also interested!
nwestfallp949
Looking for Similar Logic Games to Practice that are hybrid type with a ton of variables kinda like PT 5 Game 4 or PT 89 Game 4. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I feel like (A) is wrong for the crucial reasoning that if A were true and the other group did acquire the self-help book on their own then yes it would be something that the argument overlooked but it would not address the statistical difference in why the group who was initially given the self-help book went fewer times to the doctor. If (A) were true then you would expect that there would be similar results between the two groups and not a difference. That was my justification for eliminating (A); might not be right but just thought I'd share my thought process with it.
I am interested as well!
I wouldn't stress too much over it and also if it helps I just did my LSAT writing last night and it was already approved this morning which was super quick turn around!