- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Does anyone have a good comprehensive strategy for addressing these question types? They are very similar to strengthen, but for some reason I find them more difficult. For example, often times the answers appear as principles, sometimes a weaker principle would work for one question and a stronger principle is required for another. Does anyone have a good method for eliminating answer choices here and selecting a choice with the correct amount of strength?
Thanks,
Oliver
@jordanjohnsonjr282 thanks for sharing, I agree that RC is so important since it’s the highest weighted. Would you share any comprehensive process you have for. Inference, difficult MP ( I miss ~1/6) and author agree ?
What an inspiring and amazing story. Thanks for Sharing ! I would also love to see your document if you would be willing to share it.
Y’ll still accepting members, currently in the 155-160 range and shooting for 175+. Would love to join
Keep going, we are all in the same boat. I did similarly well out of undergrad ect. This test is brutal. Try not to beat yourself up over the jagged performance. Just keep learning, and practicing the content. Be a hardo on yourself to never give up, but give yourself a break here and there. One thing that is really helping me is to do more drills and other types of content in-between practice tests. Doing too many PTs gets exhausting and I found myself to focus too much on the scores rather than my own improvement. Hang in there you got this!
Congrats and thank for taking the time to share some wisdom @giuliapines511. What was it you did to change your LG approach?
In the analytics section for PTs sections are given ratings of easy, medium, difficult. I've found out that these are averaged based on the extent to which 7sagers struggle with a given section. However, isn't this meaningless since the test is designed to be standard? The range of difficulty should change much because there is no curve...thoughts?
@shambhabipaudyal1643 hey! I’m in the exact same not, consistent 160s sometimes low sometimes high, if you want to work together, it might be nice to check in every once and a while as we break thru to 170s