Not sure why E is incorrect

If Ditalgame’s games are copied more frequently, shouldn’t that translate into revenue once that avenue is taken away?

Ex.

Ditalgame before protection:

Games bought: 100

Games illegally copied:1000

Ditalgame after protection:

Games bought: 1000

Games illegally copied:0

There is no logic games on the LSAT anymore

I think JY needs to be more clear on why wrong answers are wrong. For ex, AC C, just saying “it has nothing to do with it” is not helping anyone. I would like to know how it doesn’t relate.

I chose A because I made 3 mistakes:

1.) I linked "ought not be said" with the idea that it should be illegal

2.) I didnt take the first sentence into account about the legality argument missing the point

3.) I didnt catch that it should be the artists, not the law, doing the censorship

I fell for the trap and chose C. I thought "today's standards" include maturity, complexity, and grace.

Why is C incorrect? if you use the negation technique, doesn't the statement "There are plays that the critic has not seen or read" open the door that there can be even one that will be popular? The critic cannot make such a blanket statement that NONE will be popular several centuries from now.