- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hey Everyone,
Hope all is well! I've been studying since July and am looking for a tutor at this point in my LSAT journey. Anybody know where I should be looking?
For context, my diagnostic was a 156 and I've since built up to PTing around 164. On some occasions, I've scored as high as 170 on PTs. I scored a 163 on the October administration, and literally took November today where I was absolutely demoralized by the games section. This took place even though I committed the last month to intense focus on games. Thus, I'm pretty sure I didn't hit my target score of 170. If anyone is reading this, feel free to provide me some advice or send some tutors my way. I'm panicking! Thanks.
I found that C and A weren't the correct answer choices because the conclusion is about male cats, and these answer choices invoked female cats in an irrelevant way. Does this make sense?
I ruled out C because the assumption at play was "if unaware, then involuntary." and C is a trap answer choice that reverses the sufficient and necessary conditions of the assumption to deceive us.
If C instead said "not all actions of which someone is unaware are involuntary," it would have weakened the argument. But it unfortunately says the reverse: that not all of a persons involuntary actions are actions of which that person is unaware! I think this is pretty clever of the LSAT, so don't be fooled fellow high scoring aspirants!
Sheesh I chose B to strengthen that traditional attribution has special weight -- not the position that traditional attribution shouldn't have extra weight. READ THE QUESTION STEM CLOSELY FELLOW LSAT TAKERS. Especially on these really difficult ones.