These questions are definitely the time sinkers but couple of tips which helped me to understand them better.

1. Try to see which logic they use, whether the stimulus contains an conditional or causal logic, the correct AC should have something similar.

2. Pay attention to the tone of the conclusion, for this question, the conclusion was negative, so I kind of picked A and moved on lol (will not work all the time)

3. Typically, the similar content between the stimulus and AC won't be the correct answer, so AC B which talks about art painting, I just skimmed over it and crossed it out.

Hope this helps!

I also struggle with flaw questions, but I try to anticipate the flaw based on the stimulus. Some flaw questions will have those cookie cutter wrong answer choices

"under-represented sample", "presupposes the argument (circular reasoning)", "oldest mistake in the book", "source attack", "cause and effect"

And realizing some of the answer choices are wrong allows me to eliminate them faster than just staring at the question for a long time.

So after glancing at the stimulus, try to anticipate where the flaw exists and immediately cross out the wrong answer choices, and you can make more of an "educated guess".

Hope this helps!

It's a tough concept, but I read this from another source and it helped me to visualize the concepts between SA, NA, and Strengthen.

If the conclusion was "This person is a good golfer", then the NA would be something like, "This person never misses his/her swing."/"This person always hits the ball".

A strengthening would be "This person has won multiple local tournaments"/"This person is the best golfer in his town".

And a SA would be "This person has won the national golf tournament."

SA would make the premise and the conclusion air-tight so that the correct answer choice has to make the conclusion true. If you just won the national golf tournament, then it supports the conclusion that you must be a good golfer.

Hope this helps!

For question 7, maybe I misread it, but isn't C anti-supported? Because the last sentence states these plantations only make up 3% of the forests in the world.

Any thoughts?

I was able to get one question wrong, but took me around 10 minutes. I understand this is the walk phase, any advice on getting toward the run phase?

Also, loving the new RC modules, definitely helpful!

Definitely liked the way Kevin explained answer choice D, and how some skills (negation technique) from LR can be utilized in RC.