Loved this one. Was great to see the various methods and examples, and compare them to how I typically translate.

Interested. Taking LSAT in June or August

fml time to drop some of my friends

For Q2, last sentence says "Nittens is available for adoption". If we are following "words on the page" rule, we should not assume Nittens is a cat. For all we know, Nittens could be a dog, a giraffe, a car. No valid conclusion can be drawn, unless the statements reads something along the lines of "Nittens, a cat, is available for adoption."

Am I wrong to not being making the assumption that Nittens is a cat?