- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
Hey I’m a non traditional student and have worked jobs and had a career in the military. This is just a test. You have taken many like it in high school but you can look back and realize that those tests didn’t define you. It might get you more money at a bigger firm but in the grand scheme of things this test is to make sure you can do the job at a bare minimum. If you’re shooting for high scores know that 3% of testers reach over 170 and those people could be bad lawyers still. If you’re struggling to comprehend I would say this test is a problem that can be solved. That means work harder and be more consistent. Studying too much and in your head? Take a break.
Main takeaway: It’s just a test and most of the time it’s only as complicated as you choose to make it.
The thing that helped me was thinking of the if and then as metrics in which to measure something. One is a measurement of time past 5 minutes. The other is a measurement of being late.
Since the measurement of time past 5 minutes is on the right then you are not measuring for that metric. (17 minutes is irrelevant in the 2nd premise)
Since the measurement of being late is on the left, then you are measuring for that metric.
Nothing was mentioned about whether or not he was late in the 2nd premise, just that he arrived 17 minutes after the bell, so no valid conclusion can be drawn because the sentence ha.
Likely Mistake Made: You tried to measure for the 5+ minutes metric but its on the right, you only measure for the metric on the left (late or not). You assumed that being late was equivalent to 5+ minutes but they are separate.