Isn't it a bit ironic that they types of RC passages people find the most boring are the legal ones?

An article I just read about it said that they would of had to of notified schools that the candidate was legally blind to explain that they graded him differently. I'm curious if perhaps there is a law that states that organizations or schools can't provide medical info about a candidate on a form as a way to ensure that a candidate isn't discriminated against. It's speculation but it would make their hardnosed position make more sense to me, it seems so weird if they thought this guy could do logic games without diagramming and didn't see that this was a major problem.

They write the word "enable", it could be the case that every student has the opportunity to write a different AR section if the LSAC grants an exemption. The statement doesn't necessarily mean that they will be transitioning. Though i would guess that it probably would be the case that they would.