#help Can someone explain the grammar in the conclusion of the stimulus? I got kinda tripped up where it says would be difficult to domesticate or would not be worth domesticating — doesn't that refer to the past tense, of the ease/value of domestication back thousands of years ago? and if it does, then doesn't that kind of invalidate the attack on the analogy structure?

I was super confused by this because even if the wild species are easier to domesticate now, doesn't that have zero bearing on how easy they were / valuable it was to domesticate them back then?