Self-study
This was a toughy
Admin note: For the community to better assist you, please include PrepTest number, section number and question number in the following format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"
prestonaz24
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided
Discussions
prestonaz24
Sunday, May 14 2023
I am so fired up - there is no way that J.Y. solved that cold - I'm sorry but question choice D is not the initially logically natural choice. C is right - but that is not how we have been taught to solve SA questions.
Assuming that the data is correct is not using lawgic - it's an assumption to the lawgic itself, which is something that we are taught we should always assume in the LR section. Awful question that does not do the intended purpose of the LSAT - show the ability to logically reason. ugh.
prestonaz24
Saturday, Apr 22 2023
to breakdown:
Main Conclusion: JUST look at the conclusion
Most Strongly Support: identify the Premise and choose answer that supports
Most seriously weakens: JUST look at the Support and find contradicting evidence.
Contradicting isn't quite the right word - but it's synonymous. Further elaboration would be: contradicting, argument weakening, or argument de-valued evidence.
This is the mass confusion on my end
A: Many insects that have similar vision to bees do not depend on perceiving an object's color. Does that imply that bees, like many insects, do not depend on perceiving an objects color? If bees do not depend on perceiving an objects color, then how have flowers adapted to bee's vision? They cannot see the color.
A is then implying that bees rely on color. Many insects have similar vision to bees, but not in respect to color. Color is exclusively a bee thing. If color is exclusively a bee thing, then flowers adapted to bees? It doesn't prove anything. Please help.