AHHHHHHHH everyone is getting it right but meeeeeeee

i'm literally getting a worse score every time 😭

When explaining in the premise + conclusion practice question 9.3 that there is no argument, my friend explained that when you read "just facts", that's just facts--no argument. I think her explanation helped a little more than the explanation that " The claim about what happened before the price increase isn't offered to help prove what happened after the increase."

Also, I wish there was a little more clarification behind question 6.1 in the context skill builder where a "contextual argument" was mentioned--because I thought that what the scientists were saying was just a fact and there was no argument. But only after awhile of thinking, did I realize the scientists were opposing the context and therefore it shouldn't be taken as a fact.