- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
🔢 I'm currently scoring: 165-172 (untimed) 155-160(timed)
📆 My planned test date: 2023 Nov.
📈 To study, I have been: finishing around 50 PTS
🔑 My goals for this group are: to help each other and, to hear other perspectives
🔍 We'll focus on: Reading Comprehension, Logic Reasoning
📚 When we'll meet and what we'll do: three days a week based on majority's availability, PT review and drills
✅ How to join: discord group(https://discord.gg/vFwxD4mw)
Please do not hesitate to leave your message.
Hi everyone. I am looking for a study buddy/study group to do PT review or timed drills together consistently.
My untimed PT score is usually above 170. I'm struggled with time management. Let me know if you are interested.
Hi everyone. I am looking for a study buddy to do blind review together for PTs consistently. My average score is 166 currently (LG -0~2, LR -3~5, RC-4~7). I would prefer to do the tests on the basis of every three days. Let me know if you are interested.
Hi, I am an international examiner as well. I kept practicing untimed test for the past couple months, and my accuracy improved a lot (my score usually range from 165-170). I have been blind reviewing with a study buddy I found on 7 sage, and that really helps. (I only got 140+~150+ when I started.)
Now my study buddy and I are going to take this Jan test. I hope I can do well, but I also know that the result probably can't meet my expectation due to my current reading speed.
Let me know if you want to study together (blind review together) if I actually would not do well in this Jan test.
Thanks.
I think it's the way of expression for E means something different from "only very old moose got eaten by the wolves". Instead, E probably is just telling us what happened to those old moose, but does not tell us what happened to the rest of the herd like young ones. I guess we can't assume younger mouse are not eaten by wolves at all by E.
I chose A at the beginning, and different from JY's explanation, I now think A is wrong because it says wolves discourage other predators from "moving in". So my understanding is that A is not saying that wolves are not stopping the predators that are "currently eating the mouse", but instead the wolves just may prevent the mouse from being eaten by future "moving in" predators. So it's not strong enough to explain why the mouse number keeps increasing.
I really dislike C for obvious reason that I don't want to assume that mentioned disease is a deadly disease. But by excluding A and E, this seems to be the only viable one....Does seem to be a little stronger than the rest...