Hi,
I am having difficulty diagramming this question:
This is what I have so far:
P1: ~Increase Ag Prod. ----> Reduce Biodiv.---> Abandon C.A.
C : Sustain EG ----> Increase Ag Prod.---> Abandon C.A.
I assumed that abandoning conventional agricultural techniques, and radically modifying agricultural techniques to be the same (Abandon C.A.)
Any help would be much appreciated!
Admin note: edited title; please use the format of "PT#.S#.Q# - [brief description]"
Oh I see. Thank you for clarifying. I've started to ID the conclusion more deliberately now and it helps. Thanks and sorry for the late response
Hi- I have been focusing on NA questions, and was looking for quick ways to identify answers. I had some trouble differentiating between (B) and (E). The right answer is B. My question is---- Will the answer in Necessary Assumption Questions follow the format below?
answer---------> conclusion which is equiv. to ~conclusion---------------> ~answer
The question is below. I have diagrammed B and E.
"People who browse the web for medical information Admin edit: Please review our forum rules. Please don't post licensed LSAC materials."
(B)
~Diagnose medical cond. do more harm----------------------------> rely exclusiv. on scientific info
~rely exclusiv. on scientifi info------------------------------------> Diagnose medical cond. do more harm
vs.
(E)
Diagnose medical cond. do more harm----------> rely on quackery
~rely on quackery-----------------------> ~diagnose medical cond. do more harm
Which one of the following is an assumption the argument requires?
Admin edit: Deleted
Admin note: edited title
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-11/
#help
How are we able to eliminate b? How can we assume the company will give another dull performance just because of their previous performances? I am so confused by this. Any help would be appreciated please.