SA

The 4 wrong answers have new words not found in the Conclusion. Public, good novel, bla bla. The Only correct answer B closes the gap between style and money in the CONCLUSION. We have a gap and B closes it. FOCUS ON THE CONCLUSION.

I missed the fact that he actually did give the proper info even though he misunderstood the question. I got it right by POE.

FOLLOW THE ARROW.

Conclusion: If NOT older than 6--> NO pets. [ If pets--> older than 6]

Answer E: If pets--> Older than 6 ( with the feelings etc connected to age 6 and above)

Answer B: IF. children older than 6--> Pets. WRONG ARROW.

E is wrong because it's the PROFITS that are connected to integrity, not the " conventional film". Focus on the CONCLUSION, not on the background information.

I fell in the exact same trap. Chose human life... BUT in fact human life is PART of all living things in the premises, so that was my mistake. It was NOT a new word at all because it's part of a bigger word in the premises. On the other hand ORIGIN is totally new. It's about the beginning of something. The premises are about the anatomy/ composition of all living things, not about their ORIGIN. E is the only choice with the word ORIGIN.

the best!

30 seconds: AC E is correct. New word in the conclusion CIGARETTE. Only D and E have that word. Watch out for the direction of the arrow. CONCLUSION: IF smoke--> does not care. Counterpositive

IF care-->Does not smoke. BINGO! E.

30 seconds: New word in the conclusion: complete knowledge. Only Answers C and D have that word. C is a strong AC=> SA. D is very weak/ not a SA answer.

You are covering the answers with bold large letters throughout the entire video! How do we work/ think/ read with such videos???

@administration

Just fix it.

very good and to the point. 180 to u!

The easy way. Conclusion has a new word. Explain consciousness. Only B has that word. Go fish for explain consciousness and move on. If time is available, double check with a diagram. SA are so easy because we only need to GO FISH for the new word. FIND THE CONCLUSION'S NEW WORD/ PREDICT/ FISH => SA

The easy way. CONCLUSION: it's all about BITTER.

Only one answer is about BITTER!! All the rest is a DISTRACTION. THIS IS SA. We need super strong answer about Bitter but WAIT! There is only one choice that even talks about BITTER! D is a given.

exactly right. One always wins by focusing on the CONCLUSION.

they already told us that the skin has a larger quantity of solanine PER POTATO OF THE SAME SIZE. A does not give us any new info. C is what is needed to GUARANTEE less solanine.

Easy explanation. SHIFT OF WORDS! The premises are about NOVELS/ the Conclusion is about BOOKS. The numbers and letters Z and 1991/ 1992 are a DISTRACTION! Focus on the conclusion ONLY! BOOKS? We know nothing about BOOKS. Answer B is a given!

Ah… this is the one million dollar question! We can NEVER attack a premise in the LSAT! That is a fundamental rule. A premise is a FACT. You can’t attack facts. 😊

Yes! Thank you. I researched this over the last 2 months! It’s actually “ the only- only “ that is sufficient!! All the other “ only”’s are necessary indicators 😊

AC B and AC D start by the word NO. This is a MBT question and in the stimulus you can see several not, no and any- absolute indicators, aka direct arrow →. Look at my chain above. So, you attack AC B and D first, looking for the straight arrow of the chain you made. You want to start with the arrow because "most, some and any" are hard to prove and take time. B is out. D is correct. Don't need to even read A, C and E.

what now?

Oh I just noticed your “ name”! 😂 Your comment makes a lot of sense!

No. I like to share for other's benefit not for personal reasons. I appreciate when others do the same for me and judging by the comments people need another view. 😊

see my method above. I hope it helps.

see my 2 minutes method above. I hope it helps.

see my method above. I hope it helps.

see my method above. I hope it helps.