D: we have NO info about leachate being SENT to plants incapable of handling it. D is not correct even as an " inference".

4>2

3>2 --51% of the time/. The other 49% of the time, 2>3

2>1

Answer D: 4>2>3

I used 51% for easy access to this problem.

same

D should read 10 TIMES LESS, not less than 10 times. Completely wrong writing of D. @administration. @help.

terrible waste of time for us trying to understand a wrong answer as correct

I get it now. Thanks!! Violating the precept inverts the arrow from NA to SA...↔

2 years later- no better

If I + F→U

←s→

If Not U→Not I or Not F

If Modern A + Egoism→Not F that is necessary for Not U... Yaks. Very terrible Q. I'm struggling with how they inverted the arrow from NA to SA. Is this about modern A have violated the rule? I.E. they have another rule: Personality→Not functional. But still how do we get to Not U? We can't just make this ↔ ? I'm checking with a tutor.

Flaw: correlation for causation.

A: addresses the flaw by addressing a different alternative for causation/ correlation.

Conclusion: If Help ( SA)→Transfer ( NA)

Answer B: If Not Transfer→Not help. ( counter-positive=same conclusion)

Trap is E: If Transfer→Help - don't we all know how often LSAT uses that mistake: NA for SA! 30-40% of all flaws

I see very often that LSAT assumes that Vision is a psychological thing. Medically speaking, it is not- it's purely physiological- but LSAT uses that in many tests. So, memo to self-vision is a " psychological" thing on the LSAT. Forget medicine!

Conclusion: if P→D

Answer C: If P→D

too obvious indeed so I got the wrong AC :(

" ornamental" is for decoration. Not for honey. Crazy reasoning

:(

the question is good but the explanation is not so good:(

Conclusion: IF A→B

we need to weaken this. How can we weaken this? The conclusion is saying that B is necessary for A. The conclusion is saying that if NO B→NO A

Answer C is giving us an alternative explanation about why NOT A.

REMEMBER: Alternative explanation is. a WEAKENER

The deliberate exclusion of an alternative explanation in an answer choice is a STRENGTHENER.

convicted not = sentenced. wow... seriously? I thought convicted = sentenced.

see above :)

I have a different logic about C and it was working for me. Fring states that the reason companies hire :" expert Consultants" is NOT to get a good advice BUT in order to get LESS responsibility. They will blame someone else... Well, look at C: They are a firm of EXPERT CONSULTANTS!!. This is what they do for living!! EXPERT CONSULTING. The only reason they HIRE another expert consultant is to decrease responsibility. Quite funny actually...

eliminate the alternative is a common correct AC for a MOST strengthening question. C is good. A is also OK so we NEED to read all the answers... MOST is key here...

for Q 6: it's literally spelled out in the passage. Lines 33,34 = spell out question 6, line 35= spell out the answer. SPELLED OUT WORD FOR WORD.

Only introduces a NA. So, it's the NA that is false. B.

"EVEN" is a concession. LSAT uses " qualifying" and " undermining" for a concession answer choice. It's another way to get to the correct answer. There is a qualification, weakening, and concession of the supporting evidence: French Revolution is actually not so great. CONCESSION.

D is a mouthful! LOL!! I had to eliminate 2 negatives and finally get D and it's wrong! ( remove NOT and remove OBJECTION) and what is left is AGAINST the alternative). Explain against the alternative is not at all what happens here. :)

Stilgoe/ not the author. It's about what Stilgoe thinks. MSS question about Stilgoe. You can eliminate most other questions simply from their strong statements. CAN is a wonderful answer choice for MSS.

Q 10. With pre-phrasing, it was clearly the " journalists, novelists and illustrators". Only D and E talk about them. They were NOT enthusiastic at all--> Not D.

E is correct.

Q 8. They ask us to look at line 13 BUT it is line 8 that has the answer spelled out: PUBLIC ATTITUDES REGARDING THE RAILROADS. Line 13 is saying : THIS ISSUE ( WHICH ONE?) THE ONE ABOVE: PUBLIC ATTITUDES REGARDING RAILROADS- referential phrase again... LSAT LOVES THIS! " this issue" is the big bold letters above.

C is the exact opposite of the principal we are trying to apply. We need some INDIVIDUALS to be inconvenienced /troubled for the better state of society. C is the society being troubled/ inconvenienced for the good of individuals. The exact opposite. They forgot to even speak about C in this video. Very sad indeed. This is a 4 star question.