Just broke 170 on a PT (174 BR), with -0 in LR and RC. -10 or something in LG.
I very consistently get to the last game with about 5 minutes remaining, which just isn't enough.
I think I lose a lot of time on must be true/must be false questions where the answer isn't immediately obvious just by looking, bc I have to go through each answer, making inferences based on its condition, eliminating it, and repeating the process with the next one.
Question explanations aren't very helpful because, given enough time, I can get the correct answer to basically any LG question--the issue is just timing.
I feel like there's either some technique or strategy I'm missing, or I just need to practice lots more and build up an intuition that will help me move through them quickly?
I'd love to hear input from people in a similar boat as me: high diagnostic test (-2 and -3 on RC/LR) with bombed LG, then rapid improvement on LG but still struggling with time. Does it get better?
I average about -2 on RC. This could be bad advice for a test prep context, but I think the reason I do well on RC is that I've spent time reading things that are just way harder than anything you'll find on the LSAT. Maybe spend a week reading some Kant or Hegel or something, get really good at parsing it, and come back to RC. I don't know if a week would be enough to develop those skills, but I do think reading really hard stuff is why I'm good at RC.