This morning was pretty devastating. I took the June LSAT without any studying and got a 161. Then I retook it in September after completing about 100 hours of studying and literally got a 162.
I felt like I really saw improvements in my understanding and application. So is this the best I can do?
I understand why B but I initially got rid of it bc if its owner operated why would it have a CEO? Those seem to contradict
I took the June LSAT with ZERO studying and no accommodations, just to see how I would do with logic games before they were gone forever and got a 161.
I’ve completed all the lesson videos and done a handful of drills, but haven’t really had time to take an actual practice test.
I take the September LSAT this Thursday and am really hoping I don’t have to retake in November.
So I’m wondering is a 7 point jump realistic now that I’ve studied and have accommodations for time and a half?
I think as long as I get a 165 I won’t be completely crushed, but obviously I just want to be done.
on most other questions when an answer uses the word "only" its typically wrong, but the reason for A being right despite using "only" is because its the only one that sort of makes sense correct? like A isnt the best but its the best out of what we're offered?