Hello everyone, I know this may sound like an odd question but I have never taken the LSAT. If you were to purchase one of the LSACS booklets, lets say test number 70. Does that booklet represent the exact same size of page and font that the real test looks like?
I was just curious to know if I am the only one having this issue. Right now when i search for questions in the question bank it is not separating questions out in terms of sections. so for example you will just see Q01 Q01 but it does not separate out the questions from each section for logical reasoning
I know there has been various threads on this. I was just curious to see what are peoples thoughts on their success with either not reading the reading comprehension questions beforehand or not.
Admin edit: Please don't use all caps in titles, I don't like to be yelled at.
as the title mentioned i was curious to know when the When do the June 2016 LSAT questions get released as a preptest to practice with?
Are the words "all potential" just meant to throw us off?
I am curious to see if anyone can tell me why they use the term "all potential"nuclear reactor sites in such a region.... why did they not just say "nuclear reactor sites in such a region" is the addition of "all potential" just a term to throw us off..... if you removed the word all potential from the stimulus and the answer choices would he question be the same? because to me it just seems that the term all potential is just a label to try and throw us off... because once you mention nuclear reactor sites in such a region.. you already know that you are talking about nuclear reactor sites that are in a geologically quiet region.
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-2-question-21/
I am just curious to know if anyone here has written an LSAT with accommodations. If so i just had some specific questions
where are the webinars being posted?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-28-section-3-question-21/
hello everyone, this is a question that was asked but there was no clear answer. The answer choice for A, if you take the contraceptive it matches the flaw. Is A only wrong because D just has a better match? if D were not there, would A be correct?
https://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-27-section-4-question-13/
Admin: Edited out passage because it was word for word. Please paraphrase.
I wanted to ask if this is the breakdown. because in J.Y.'s video he says that where it states "so it is no less wrong to grant this power to society" is the conclusion, but i see that as the sub conclusion.
and I thought the main conclusion would be [The ancient Greeks failed to recognize that morally, democracy is no improvement over monarchy] ..... because then you say "why should i believe this" and the rest of the argument tells you why.
Hello, I see that members like myself who have the Ultimate+ package also get access to the Admissions Starter package. where is this located?
I was curious to know if you are allowed to bring your notes to the lsat and read them during the break if you wanted to?
Sorry I meant the Passage with the most amount of questions
and just to add to that. there have been numerous times that i caught a wrong assumption by seeing another answer choice. for example i chose A, but then realized E could also be true, so i did something wrong, went back and fixed it. i am curious to know how top scorers are doing it. do you get through all the answers or just pick and move on
I am just curious to know for logic games, people who are scoring well in that section, once you find what you believe to be the answer choice. do you move on to the next question? or are you also verifying the the other answers as well just to make sure the answer you chose is correct?
I am just just curious to know if anyone looks at the RC passages and then does the longest ones first?
so can everyone PLEASE even for my sake email LSAC. and Ask because if we get a different response from ACCOM then I will go back to them and ask them how on earth they gave me this information! I was asking you guys to email, not to be stingy, but to build on my findings.
everyone I would not do this to lie or harm this community. Never-mind that I posted it then. I was trying to help by posting this @ The only reason I have not posted the email, is that those kind of things I dont know the degree of confidentiality. That fact that anyone would think I would just be randomly making this up would be ridiculous. I was trying to HELP to inform everyone.
the email i received had the following in it. and I am copying and pasting this
"When LSAC was annotating the scores earned with additional test time, the unscored section was not always included in each test administered. Beginning with the September 2016 test administration, all tests have five multiple-choice sections."
and NO i would not go out of my way to create a thread RANDOMLY. I WAS TRYING TO HELP. and that is why i asked everyone to email accom at lsac. because who knows maybe someone from lsac emailed me the wrong information? but i highly doubt it.
Hello everyone,
how do you draw out the logic for the following statement, and take the contrapositive.
Statement: The only way to stop the baby from crying is to give her some cold medication or a nip of wiskey, but not both.
I hope everyone sends an email out and updates this thread. please EMAIL LSAC. the people on the phone are not the accommodation people. they are a very different group
im telling you. just email accom@.org and ask them if it is true that as of the september lsat that accomodated students will not be writing the experimental section
I know this may be a bit silly to ask, but I don't see this used anywhere else. What does the dash mean in reading comprehension passages? for example "Indeed, certain notables even called for the enslavement of unemployed laborers who roamed the british countryside -------- an acceptance of coerced labor that Eltis attributes to a preindustrial desire to keep labor costs low.......
what does that dash mean between countryside and the word AN
whoever you talk to on the phone will not give you a write answer you need to write to accommodations email that is on the website.
Is 7sage missing a question type in logical reasoning? Evaluate the Argument Questions
yes i am talking about the experimental. this is a new change starting in the September test. this is right from lsac. email the accom email and you will see
In the past those who wrote with accommodations did not take the variable section. Starting in September on and onward accommodated testers will be taking the test with the variable section.
what are pts A B C and C2?
Your three-sentence biography.
My Degree was in electrical engineering, and then I did my MBA. I currently work at Google, and want to pursue law for the purposes of going into Patent Law.
Your biggest worry about your application.
My biggest worry about my application, is that my undergraduate grades are not the best.
Two ideas for your personal statement.
So I have very interesting question. my personal statement would actually involve how i went to court with a big multinational company on my own. And there are new stories about it. There are links on the internet that lead directly to the story. So my question is what is the best way to include public links to the news stories in my application?
Did you attend last time? Did I get to you?
I did not attend last time
Just wanted to verify is a contradiction the same as a counter example?
when are these being posted for 7sagers for review after the fact?
hello is there any idea of when JY will be posting the review of the June 2016 test? Test 78
i dont know how else to explain this and this is right from lsacs book
If you do something deliberately then you deserve praise for it
Do something deliberately ->you deserve praise for it
It would be saying that doing something deliberately is a sufficient condition for deserving praise for it
you would say that this sentence EXPRESSES " the sufficient conditions for deserving praise for something"........ you would not say that this sentence "expresses necessary conditions for doing something deliberately"
This is a fine point that I think a lot of people are missing, and I am trying to track down the exact way of knowing this. is it based on where the major subject of the conditional is
ryandoon215
I hope I can explain this
1)I fully understand how to convert any sentence into Sufficient and Necessary conditions
2)Where I am having problems is identifying whether the sentence is supplying sufficient conditions for something or if it is supplying necessary conditions for something
3)What I am hoping to understand is the actual grammar breakdown for why it is the way it is
4)below are some examples from a book. what makes a sentence a "sufficient sentence" and what makes a sentence a "necessary sentence"... is it based on "what the main subject of the sentence is" is it based on the predicate verb? what is the actual fundamental grammar rules that dictate this. Yes i know if you say it out loud you would figure it out. but I am trying to understand from a pure grammatical perspective. Thankyou
You don’t deserve praise for something unless you did it deliberately
Deserve Praise for something --> you did something deliberately
Necessary condition
Doing something deliberately is a necessary condition for deserving praise for something
If you do something deliberately then you deserve praise for it
Do something deliberately ->you deserve praise for it
It would be saying that doing something deliberately is a sufficient condition for deserving praise for it
I was curious to know if anyone has taken the C2 test and what they thought about its difficulty.
I SERIOUSLY LOVE THIS COMMUNITY. THANK YOU EVERYONE FOR THE FEEDBACK :)
@ @ so how do you feel about the 7 sage prep. and did you use anything else besides 7 sage. and if you did. why?
Hello I am just curious to see how 7sagers felt about the 7sage course and their june LSAT. is there anything you would have done differently? how did you find that the course prepared you?
Hello everyone, I seem to be having some issues with negating sentences, some things are very obvious, but others are not. for example
1)The Fine arts would be more highly developed now if they had been given greater governmental subsidies in the past.
(what is the best way to analyze this sentence to figure out how to negate it)
2)If contemporary governments help to maintain and enrich the fine arts, private support for the arts will become necessary
(what is the best way to analyze this sentence to figure out how to negate it)
3)in contemporary societies, aristocracies and religious institutions are not willing to help finance the fine ares
for a sentence like this i just take the rule, that if i see the word NOT, i will just remove the word NOT)
4)Serving as stewards of cultural heritage requires that contemporary societies help to maintain the fine arts.
(what is the best way to analyze this sentence to figure out how to negate it)
5)Maintenance, advancement, and enrichment of the fine arts in any era require governmental subsidies.
(what is the best way to analyze this sentence to figure out how to negate it)
@ can you describe what you mean by shockingly more different.
@ i only ask to understand. then how are questions shared here ?
i did not realize that was the case..... now my question would be.. what is the difference between sharing a screen shot of an image of a PDF vs sharing out verbatim the questions typed out?
Hi There everyone. I will be taking the February LSAT. Usually LSAC publishes the PAST LSAC for purchase before the New LSAT. So for example the December Exam would be available for purchase before you take the February LSAT. I just called LSAC and they said because the time interval between December and February is so close that they dont have time to publish before the February Exam.
Admin edit: Please review our forum rules. Posting licensed LSAC materials (PTs / PDFs containing LSAC questions / screenshots showing LSAT questions) is against our TOS and LSAC's TOS.
Does anyone know when JY will be hosting the next blind review session?
you guys are all so helpful :) @ thankyou for all the responses. and everyone else as well! I love that 7sage has this community where you can get answers !!!!
hey i should have also mentioned that i also have the extended time as well. so yes @ and @ i also have the extended time per section. so odd
Hello everyone. I am taking the LSAT in september. As far as i understand those who have accommodations do not write the experimental section. but yet in my accommodation sheet it says the following:
After Section 1, Break(s) for X minutes
After Section 2, Break(s) for X minutes
After Section 3, Break(s) for X minutes
After Section 4, Break(s) for X minutes
After Section 5, Break(s) for X minutes
so i asked LSAC if this mistake. and they said no.
they even said the following :
There are 5 multiple-choices sections and 1 writing sample section with breaks between each section
does anyone have any thoughts on this
Interested