For PT 7 S1 Q 16 I don’t see how if more mass equals more light that if the comet is 60 times smaller how the previous estimates would be too small? that’s less mass, so how would answer choice B make any sense if it’s saying the exact opposite? I’m convinced the LSAT writers messed this question up. I’ve looked at this over and over and can’t possibly see how B could ever possibly be right.