Wow, D is such an attractive wrong answer choice..props to the writers.

i see the amogus...great explanation

Great explanation!

Would attending this webinar benefit students applying to schools in Canada?

AC A provides support because it is showing that when there is not a conflict of sensing motion through the eyes and ears, people are less likely to get sick. The hypothesis is that when there is a conflict of sensing motion between senses, people are more likely to get sick. So AC A clearly strengthens the argument. AC C conflicts with the hypothesis because in this scenario, the senses are on the same page.

I switched from C to D. I can see that C is much better supported than D because I wasn't given adequate information from the passage to support the claims of non-T/V sponges.

The answer is B instead of D because B is the actual paraphrasing of the conclusion. D simply supports the conclusion as a premise.

I know it was mentioned that the autobuilder takes questions primarily from PT 1-45. However, it is quite frustrating that it also takes questions past this point. I've had multiple questions in the 60's, 80's, which are all unused PT's for me so far. Would love to use this feature because it is convenient, but I do not like the randomness in PT question selection.

Was split between B and D. I knew that B made sense, but I also didn't realize I should have only focused on just those parts of the sentence. Otherwise D would have made sense.

this video was a great boost for my morale lol

@ said:

Are these awards open for persons applying to Canadian JD programs or is it strictly American JD programs only?

I would assume only American seeing as the link with full details specifies it is open to students pursuing an American JD.

I was hoping it was available for Canadian JD programs too :(

Open to your help! Thank you.