- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
Typically, we fool proof for logic games, but is there any way we can methodically be successful at LR?
Hello all, I'm having a bit of trouble parsing out the language I find in any NA question stimulus. I often have to take bullet notes or diagram, which can be a waste of time on test day. Anyone have tips on how to parse out the language in a quicker manner? Many thanks in advance! I also understand that a NA is what has to be true if the conclusion is true (read from Ellen Cassidy Loophole). But I've also had a tutor tell me that an NA question is a premise that will make the conclusion potentially valid. So, I understand what a necessary assumption is, but I can't quite grasp the concept fully.
Are there any phrases/key words/types of the rules I should be on the lookout for on the LG section? How do you guys know when to split a gameboard? Thanks in advance!
Hi, thank you so much for doing this--I will be sure to join tonight. Would you consider doing "point of disagreement" questions? Please let me know--thank you in advance!
LSAT Questions be like: If aliens landed on the moon tomorrow, and we ate purple pancakes on Monday, what size shoe does your great grand uncle twice remove wear?
If aliens landed on the moon tomorrow, and we ate purple pancakes on Monday, what size shoe does your great grand uncle twice remove wear?
Note: Sorry I just had to post this because I got so frustrated with getting Necessary Assumption questions wrong.
@noraprener549 For me, it's only under timed pressure. Like, I'll get the answer right but that's only if I work through it. Thank you so much for clarifying!