salgadomateo124
As the title says, I was around -3 on LG when I stopped studying last year and now I'm -10. I would prefer not to go back into the studying materials. Does anyone have any recommendations for filling in that knowledge gap?
It may be redundant, but I highly recommend reading more educational texts. On the opposite end, I came into this test with an advantage at Reading Comprehension (I'm struggling with Logic Games currently), something I attribute to my background in English literature. Reading Comprehension certainly contains elements of Logical Reasoning, but I don't usually go into the text expecting to look for LSAT-type reasoning of any kind. What I mean to say is, when you get more comfortable reading academic texts, I suspect Reading Comprehension will come more easily.
That being said, I think it's important that you are honest with yourself when studying for the test in this regard. Are you reading every day? Most importantly, are you enjoying what you are reading? You need to be reading some sort of technical writing to get used to the writing in Reading Comprehension. Moreover, you must enjoy reading. As JY has said, you must insert yourself into the passage when reading the passages and you must form an opinion. Be passionate about the topic. In reading more, I've found that the RC passages really resonate with me. I find myself referencing their logic in everyday life (although they are by nature flawed, so I probably shouldn't). You really have to be honest with yourself when you're reading. Find a way to enjoy it. Open your heart to it, for these topics may very well be things you may have to contend with when you are a lawyer. I usually suspect that those who really find Reading Comprehension arduous have already developed an aversion to reading -- a habit that needs to be kicked immediately. Having an awful time tends to lead to a callous attitude about things.
I wouldn't beat yourself up about it though. Because I suspect Reading Comprehension is a "long-term" endeavor (opposite to something like Logic Games), you're still learning and you should treat it as such.
Me please.
matthews3100@mendozalennel887.com
"Through traffic" refers to a type of traffic, as described by Merriam Webster "traffic initiated at and destined for points outside a local zone." The word "through" here is used as an adjective, not a verb. You shouldn't have to know what "through traffic" means to answer this question though. You should simply just know that it is a type of traffic. It's probably added right beside "although" to throw you off a bit.
Why is this "or" exclusive? Can it not be the case that both the faculty and the students find it unpopular?
#help (Added by Admin)