I got the answer correct, but I was wondering if anyone else came to the conclusion that D was incorrect through a different way than as provided. For me, I read D as saying those who were vulnerable spent less time in the sun, meaning they wouldn't be a relevant party to the "experiment," to begin with. Because they are already staying out of the sun, there is no way to assess what impact sunscreen or the sun has on them. But the explanation seems to imply that they are part of the "experiment." Is this train of thought technically wrong?
3
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
I got the answer correct, but I was wondering if anyone else came to the conclusion that D was incorrect through a different way than as provided. For me, I read D as saying those who were vulnerable spent less time in the sun, meaning they wouldn't be a relevant party to the "experiment," to begin with. Because they are already staying out of the sun, there is no way to assess what impact sunscreen or the sun has on them. But the explanation seems to imply that they are part of the "experiment." Is this train of thought technically wrong?