- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I've been drilling PT 35-end, I'm currently almost at 50, but I've struck a string of just not very challenging games, or at most 1 challenging game per section. I eyeballed the difficulty based on 7sage rating, and a lot of these games have 2/5 difficulty with maybe one having 3 or 4/5. This rating is mostly consistent for the most recent PT's (with exception of the awful flower game section).
I guess what I'm asking or what I may inevitably find out is are more recent games either significantly different or harder than those in the 40's or 50's? I almost feel like I'm wasting my time drilling 40's and 50's given that they all seem not very challenging.
I don't want to do the complete test, I just want to do the timed individual section (for example I to drill all logic games from a certain PT) and then review just that section rather than the full test?
#help are we essentially ignoring the context in the stimulus when choosing answer choices? I'm a bit unsure of what i'm looking for and how to match it up to the stimulus
Question 9 messed me up because of plural in the right answer choice. :/ I thought they were pushing for ONE form (personal narrative), not many forms.
#help
Is question 5 sort of like a strengthening question? Are we assuming that all of these views presented in the answer choices are true?
Can we not assume that the mall contributes to the local economy? This question is difficult to me because I'm assuming $100m being spent at the mall is also $100m into the local economy. I guess not though? I'm still confused. #help
#help
Can we usually "ignore" or pay less attention to the context for these types of questions, since we tend to focus on the argument?
Is it normal to not be able to get this right without diagramming? It seems JY is using quite a bit of logic to answer this question, but I haven't gotten to logic yet in the CC
#help
#help
Are we not going into the premise to answer this question? I thought the conclusion was "this theory may be wrong". but nothing paraphrases the fact that the discrepancy being attributed to age may be wrong.
Is it recommended to do the core curriculum in order? It was my understanding that most people begin with logic games, however logical reasoning appears to take up the first month+ or so of studying. Is it ill-advised to go out of order for the core curriculum?
Thanks! One more question. How do I adjust the time in the problem set?