Hey everyone! There's lots of big study groups out there but I'm searching for a consistent nightly study partner to finish out the grind to the August test. Currently PTing upper 160s and looking to break 170s. I work full time so study at night only around 7-10 PM EST and weekends. Message me if interested!
hi I'm on EST and work full time as well and have pretty much the same schedule/need an accountability group!
Discord chat to start studying: https://discord.gg/zAUmMVT5
If you don’t have discord but still want to study just PM me! I’ve found discord is just easier to talk and coordinate
thanks everyone for commenting! I study at night since I work full time (6PM - 10PM EST is my range plus weekends) so if that works for any of you I'll create a discord chat and feel free to hop on that and we can talk
Hi All! I know there isn't much time left before the next few tests but wanted to see if anyone wanted to join a small group to keep each other motivated and to talk out concepts in order to reinforce understanding. Everyone says teaching each other is the best way to learn so looking to go all out in the home stretch. I'm taking Oct (likely taking Nov too) and I'm PTing in the mid-160s looking to raise a few points.
PM me or comment below if you're interested!
Hey I’m interested too!!
@! I think he's accepting new students - he was on the approved tutor list that used to be out there and I recommend!
I'm interested too! EST for me
I BR on the weekends if you do during that time I can too!
10/10 post and tutor here!! just commenting to say it’s awesome to have a tutor (@) that has first hand HLS experience AND makes LR make perfect sense. Unbeatable combo for anyone looking for a tutor!
I am also interested if you’re willing to take more people or answer a few questions! Thanks for doing this!!
Hey I just did this question so hopefully this explanation can help somewhat. First of all don't pick answer choices you don't understand unless you can absolutely rule out the rest. I didn't fully understand A but I knew B was what I was looking for so I picked it and moved on. Secondly, "takes for granted" just means assumes. If you want to get technical then yes they're assuming necessarily that this is true in order to draw their conclusion. So A says the author is assuming that LRG's sales would not have been lower still in the absence of the competitor's advertising campaign, and therefore they drew their conclusion. A is wrong for two reasons: one - the author isn't assuming this in order to make their conclusion, and two - that's not the reason this argument is invalid. A might make more sense if you think about the conclusion: the author is saying the the advertising campaign was ill conceived. He's not saying the campaign didn't produce any sales whatsoever, which is what A says. Think about it this way: if you take the "not" out of answer choice A then you can read it like this "sales would have been lower in the absence of the campaign" which means that the campaign actually helped. Now add it back in, "sales would not have been lower in the absence of the campaign" which means the campaign did absolutely nothing. Basically it comes down to sorting through that word salad. But overall you can see that's not the issue here. The issue is a correlation/causation flaw where the author assumes the advertising campaign being ill conceived is the reason for poor sales when it reality it can be anything causing the poor sales right now. Which is why B is the right answer. Hope that helps!
Me too and I also work full time!