how long did you study before you took the lsat?! btw congrats and good luck!

my logic was:

the premise said:

deep divers ---> outer shell bones that are porus

and in turn:

/outer shell porus bones ---> /deep diver

so, for me, C was saying:

deep diver or not ---> outer shell porus bones

and that was not consistent with what the premise said. idk if this is right but that's how i thought it out!

No is group 4 - negate and make necessary

Unless is group 3 - negate and make sufficient

So, to simplify, I just attached the "no" to no students and left bravery alone.

This is how I looked at it:

/S = no student chosen

B = Bravery

So, I negated B and made it sufficient since I already attached the "no" to the students chosen.

/B->/S

and the contrapositive is:

S->B

However, the conclusion in the argument is that if a student exhibits bravery they will be chosen, which would be: B->S

Please let me know if this makes sense. So, what I do when there is both a group 3 and group 4 in one sentence is that I attach one to whatever it is describing. So if i attached unless:

S=student chosen

/B=not exhibited

, then i would negate and make necessary.

/B->/S

and it's the same.

You got this. WE GOT THIS!!!!!!! Studying for feb:D

I got the same answer, "some small animals cannot move more rapidly than large animals." I think it would work, but I'm not sure.