Community Profile

Here is a LR cheat sheet I created from my studies with LSAT Trainer and taking PT's! It's not all LR questions, but hope this is helpful.

Logical Reasoning - Sufficient Assumption & Supporting Principle (Argument based)

*require conditional logic.

Identify Q Type

**Since SA or SP, your job is to find the answer that completely fixes the issue/gap/flaw in the argument.

Read stimulus and have clear picture of flaw (and therefore, argument)

(SA)The conclusion follows logically if which one of the following is assumed?

(SP-less absolute than SP) Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the economists’ reasoning?

(SP) Which one of the following principles underlies his argument?

(CP - like SP. Less about flaws, more as opinions) The reasoning above most closely conforms to which of the following principles?

(CP) Which one of the following propositions is most precisely exemplified by the situation presented above?

Logical Reasoning - Give an Example (Argument based. Very rare.)

*The stimulus will state a principle/generalized-rule, and ask you to match an example.

Which of the following best illustrates the principle mentioned above?

Which of the following most closely conforms to the principle that the passage above illustrates?

Logical Reasoning - Inference (Stimulus to Answer, not argument based)

Identify Q Type.

**Since Inference, you are using stimulus to find which answer is most provable. Often inferences answer choices are in contrapositive format of original conditional statement.

Read stimulus, mark indicators.

Eliminate to find correct answer.

Which one of the following inferences is most strongly supported by the information above?

If the statements above are true, each of the following could be true, except?

Which one of the above can be properly inferred from the statements above?

If all of the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true? (Link - Rare)

Discussions

Confirm action