I am very interested if the offer still stands!

I am very much interested too!

Have you considered reaching out to a UCI student ambassador?

Ambassadors usually provide some decent perspective but can be a little biased depending on who you talk to.

@ said:

@ Yes, you can adjust the time by tapping on the clock icon on the Digital Tester. You can then select either time accommodation, 1 min/ques, 35 minutes, Target Time or Unlimited time. See the sample GIF below:

I hope that helps! Let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you!

Thank you so much! Did not expect to be rewarded and really grateful for it!

Congrats thats huge! Will be sending you a PM for sure

I'd love to join! Im also trying to improve LG and RC. I'm an international but super flexible with timing.

Score plateaus are very common and normal. Im going through one right now actually!

What are your average scores for the sections? Are they pretty samey across the board?

LG seem to be the easiest to improve upon so focusing on that and drilling should boost your score up.

I am not entirely sure about Canadian law admissions but I have spoken to US law school admission departments about this topic.

I have been writing a few personal statements centered around my reason for wanting to be a lawyer and, like you, I wanted to mention an experience that took place during high school. I did a work experience at a big law firm whilst in my junior year and most of my essays were centered on it, which I felt was appropriate given that it solidified my desire to become an attorney.

However, after speaking with numerous admissions officers (for US law schools), all of them did say that whilst it is ok to mention it, do not make the entire essay about your time in high school as they wish to see who you are now, not in the past. What they want to see in this case is a progression of your interest in law from that high school experience to now. Essentially your journey.

I must ask, are you heading straight from undergrad to law school? If not, then the admissions officers warned it may be better to write about more current experiences.

I hope this has helped in some way.

@ said:

Hello,

What is your LSAT goal? If its's 160, then you just need to get 18 questions right in all sections. Try to look at the bigger picture of the passage. Suppose, if you have to explain this passage to your little brother who is in grade 3 and you can't do it, then we are going back to the passage.

Focus on one line and don't move to another one if you can't explain it to your little brother.

Hope this helps :)

I'm already hitting 160 but RC seems to be the section where I am hemorrhaging the most points. I started reading the passage like you've mentioned and I can usually explain them easily in my own words but it seems like timing is my enemy on the section.

@ said:

Maybe you could try Spreeder, if 7Sage's lessons are not helpful? That may help you retain more when you speed read. If you sign up for the free emails from

Graeme from LSAT Hacks, on day 4 he gives you his rules for how to succeed with Spreeder. Good luck!

Thank you, I'll check this out. I love 7sage and its been incredibly helpful overall but RC is still a pain! Always open to other options and perspectives like this one.

@ said:

you should youtube search 180 minimalist his approach is helpful and addresses issues beyond methods and techniques that could be helpful

Thank you for bringing the channel to my attention, its awesome! Also been looking at his comments on Reddit

Each person is different but I'm sure you can do it. LG is the easiest section to improve on and you can do so by really focusing on doing the foolproof method - repeating the same logic games that give you trouble over and over until you can pretty much do them from memory. You build up the ability to make inferences and it should help raise your score into the 160s. LR and RC take more time to improve on but try to figure out where your problem areas are and tackle those.

In short, put a lot of effort into improving your LG score but don't neglect RC and LR practice. You've got this.

@

The 90s are a bit easier, as well as some of the 70s. I'd give PT91 a shot and go from there, especially since you're a month away from the real test. If you want a challenge (ideally 2-3 weeks before your real LSAT) do PT 88-89. Save PT93 for a week before your test.

I think I'll do that. Might just take on a few more 80s and then start with PT91 and leave PT93 for last as you've recommended. If I have time, I'll revisit some more PTs. How many would you recommend one does before the exam? Ive seen people recommending between 20-40.

Awesome thanks @. Do you know if any of the more recent ones have been any easier? Definitely trying to get comfortable with these as they are daunting and taking a little more time out to really dig in deep and figure out what I can improve in these PTs.

Was a little worried about timing but really appreciate the words of encouragement!