i am interested as well!

i am interested!

context - claim that doesn't receive or give support (neither a premise - which gives support or a conclusion - which receives), it more like "sets the stage" for the argument

premise - gives support to the conclusion

I think it weaker because of the use of “can,” like not all tigers will cause serious injury to people, but they can. theoretically, you could also disagree with the conclusion. the Disney argument is stronger because Walt met one of the sufficient conditions for acquiring a Disney Plus pass. but thats just my view on it, not sure if I’m doing the explanation justice.