i don't understand this. wouldn't B weaken the argument by inserting a potential stimulus for the behavior??

#help (Added by Admin)

i am interested

does this argument ignore B? i don't see how this argument does not account for B

one thing my pre law advisor told me was that as long as you have a degree, an lsat score, and two letters of recommendation, there are accredited schools which will take you. if you really wanna get into the economics of it, a 3.4 gpa is very good for the standards of low barrier to entry schools which consider lower LSATs. obviously keep at it and improve as much as you can though, there is nothing innately different about you which prevents you from being unable to score as high as anyone else.

little frustrated about not knowing what posterity meant lol

i guessed b since all the others had to be wrong, but i am not certain that b is supported by this argument. just seems the least wrong?

i mean if your heart is set on a t14 school, you prolly want to do a little higher than a 160 anyway. focusing LG is definitely the most productive thing you can do to get score up