I'm in Van as well and would love that session. We can gather at VPL do a prep test together!

Premise:

Government: Nuclear plants are completely safe and there’s nothing to worry about. Ok cool. Also, we’re eliminating the financial liability in case something like a nuclear accident happens because if (when) and we’re paying a chunky compensation, the nuclear plant will go bankrupt.

People: oh wait, you’re saying that it’s safe and there’s nothing to worry about, but at the same time, you’re decreasing financial liability because you assume there’s a chance something might happen? Which is it? It’s contradictory. We absolutely need to worry!

AC C, which I initially picked, actually makes a valid argument. It is also relevant to the stimulus as well, but it does not JUSTIFY the conclusion. It just creates another argument based on the consequences of the actions.

AC D clearly says that if the government is acting as it might happen, it very well might happen!

Totally interested. let me know how I can join

Working full time and very much interested.