Ellen Cassidy for president 2020! - the god of LR
Im about to begin drilling LG's and so im wondering is there some recommended sequence i should go in? For example, should i do all order/sequencing games first, then grouping, then hybrid games? Also, since the question bank has super detailed categories for games, are there any i should begin with first? Thanks a lot
@
I like that method a lot! Ill try it out, thanks so much!!
Hey all,
So yeah long story short, im doing quite terrible on RC. Im averaging about -9ish, on my last PT i got -11 on RC but still finished with a 164 because i did well on the other sections. I really want to tighten my RC up to at least getting something like a -5 average, is that too much to ask for?! For those who are good at RC, or who improved quite a bit, could you offer me some advice?
Just in case people are still confused, the first argument exhibits a part to whole generalization flaw. Which is the exact flaw paralleled by answer choice C!
I got 7sage mainly for logic games. And between now and my exam, I dont have time to go through the entire LR curriculum so Im wondering if theres any specific topics i should study in particular? I already have a solid LR foundation and do relatively well on LR sections but if theres any popular "must study" topics in the curriculum ill definitely check them out.
Really looking forward to this, thanks a lot! What would you classify as the three other pillars of modern LR?
Is there anyway to watch these after they've ended? Like are they recorded and uploaded anywhere?
Hi there,
i was in a similar position as you but thankfully i have improved RC. One recommendation i can give you is that you could try contacting a tutor who specializes in RC. You can find plenty on 7sage but if would like my suggestion, i would turn you towards @ . He has helped me a lot with RC and has a really affordable hourly rate.
I feel like ive developed a solid grasp on the test. I have mastered LG so I consistently get -0 on it every PT -- my wrong answers typically come from LR and RC. BRing takes a really long time and so im wondering if my time is better spent just ditching the BR and doing targeted review after each PT? Any advice would be appreciated as im really torn up on what to do and i want to permanently jump out of the high 160s and into the 170s for the August exam. Thanks!
Could someone please explain the answer to me? Having a bit of trouble understanding. Thank you
Yes!
I've already done quite a bit of prep using sources such LSAT Trainer and other things so I have a decent foundation. Which lessons are popular/super useful? I dont wana go thru all of them, i'd rather spend majority of my time drilling and doing PT's now, but im open to doing lessons that are seen as useful. One that i heard is advanced logic. Any others? Thanks!
Congratulations man!!! We're so proud of you. Would you mind giving some advice for those that are yet take the exam?
@ thank you!!!
I know that
A --m--> B
A --m---> C
leads to an inference of B (--s--) C
So what inference does
A ----> B
A -----> C
lead to? Does it also lead to B (--s--) C?
Thank you for the motivation!