...Finally watch Stranger Things season 2 :smiley:

Ugh I got this question right the first time, then mistakenly chose (E) in B/R. Should have just went with my intuition on this one.

Followed my intuition on this one.

The premise of quantum mechanics predicting the tachyon travels faster than light seems to counter to the first premise. All answer choices except (C) include this premise to derive its conclusion.

I'm not sure if that's an accurate way to explain it, but that's how I arrived at answer choice (C) relatively quickly.

Yea same Feb2018Taker! I found the reading comp on this one easy and the games kind of difficult at first. I didn't diagram entirely though I should have for some of them... It was a 1L seq w/ twist, 2L seq, 1L basic seq (unknown man/woman), and then true grouping at the end.

Didn't find the LR's too difficult either. Also I had an lr experiemental.

Common Flaw #17: Confusing one possible solution for the only solution

What if innate dispositions and social conditioning could both make a certain type of music popular?

(D) Bingo.

Eliminated answer choices (B) and (C) immediately upon seeing "explain." Right away I knew those were going to be incorrect because they would not pass the two-tier test for Flaw/DW

1. Descriptively Accurate

2. Describes the Flaw

(B) and (C) are both are descriptively accurate, but neither one describes the flaw. As would be an answer that says: "the argument fails to explain that all cats like milk." ...You're right! The argument doesn't do that. But that does not describe the flaw.

(A) is descriptively accurate (sort of), but it does not describe the flaw.

(E) is just laughable.