Another way of looking at incorrect answer D is that passage A showed no real skepticism towards Evolutionary Theory so how can they be more or less skeptical if they use it as the basis of there argument about evolutionary psych.

I already knew I was wrong by the way he started off this video with "I want to remind you of something"

My reasoning for answer choice E being incorrect may be helpful without having to think about sets or subsets. I realized that we simply just don't know what all the data is. The premise implies that the data is misleading because it does't account for soil conditions like the varying conditions in local soils. But we don't actually know much more about the data. Therefore how can we know that data only testing one molecule is misleading when we don't even know the full scope of the data.