User Avatar
shiri988
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
Not provided

Discussions

User Avatar
shiri988
Sunday, Sep 08 2019

I would say the answer to this question is none of the above.

The condition in the question stem can be demonstrated as follows:

LDM --> T

Therefore, we flip and negate to get the correct assumption.

T ---> LDM

In other words, if there is no traffic --> Larry did not drive in the morning. Keep in mind its not just that it is not morning, it is that larry did not drive in the morning). I feel like with the LSAT this is a pretty key point that they won't miss in the correct answer choice.

I would review the lesson on sufficient and necessary assumptions.

3

Confirm action

Are you sure?