Hi! from Toronto and planning for Oct!

I believe that the sub-conclusion provides support to the main conclusion and receives support from the minor premise. The main conclusion on the other hand only receives support (it does not give it to another statement since it is the final conclusion). Hope that helps!

Need help with question 5.1-5.6. If the sub-sub-conclusion is meant to support the conclusion which in turn supports the main conclusion, what does the minor minor premise support? The major premise? Or is it just there to provide support to the sub-sub-conclusion?