I think you need to recognize at the end of the day this is just a standardized test and if you don't do well this time keep studying and practicing and you'll slowly improve. LSAT is hard to get better at and that's why JY recommends studying for a whole year. With that being said I think you're taking too many practice tests. If I were you I'd do 2 a week and spend the rest of the time really going over your missed questions in great detail. Finding what question types or answer choices seem to fool you. Since you said LG is hurting you the most right now I would keep going over LG lessons and doing a TON of LG to practice good diagraming which make finding the correct answer much easier. Just breathe and take it one day at a time, don't pay attention to your overall score but where you can improve. LSAT requires you to be able to handle a lot of stress without freaking out. I feel you, I'm over studying everyday to see almost no progress but I know if I keep doing it over and over and over while really focusing on my weak areas I will get better. Its just like any skill you have in life, it takes tons of repetition to master it. And that's what we are all here for, to master the LSAT and get into a good school with hopefully some scholarships. If your LSAT is weak try to make up for it in other areas of your application. Good luck and I'll see you online for the October FLEX

I really don't like answer choice B and I feel like it would not be worded like this if it were to appear on an LSAT today. The statement "by excluding alternative hypothesis" would mean to leave alternative hypothesis out. In the argument they do not truly exclude alternative hypothesis but they counter alternative hypotheses. I think there is a very big difference between excluding and countering points. If they were to exclude the alternative hypotheses the author would have never mentioned them. Maybe I am misinterpreting the meaning of exclusion? Anyone have any opinions on this?

#help (Added by Admin)