I'm in the middle of Week 3 for studying and just finished the core curriculum for the Logical Reasoning section (learning all the question types and going through all the lessons). The next step in my study scheduler is to begin going through the lessons for Reading Comprehension. Should I put LR aside for now and go onto RC and LG (learning all the fundamentals and going through all the lessons) and then begin practicing and improving each section or should I try to drill and work on mastering LR first before moving on to the next sections? When does taking full PTs come into the picture?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
From:
A‑m→B
A‑m→C
You can conclude:
B←s→C
Hi,
You've got the mapping incorrect! You said radiant floor heating→ cool or lux. However, if you read the first sentence of our argument, it says a hotel will have a radiant floor heating system IF cool or lux. IF indicates sufficient condition, so cool or lux would be the sufficient condition in front of the arrow instead of the necessary condition after the arrow like you mapped out above. The correct mapping would go:
cool →radiant floor heating
lux→ radiant floor heating
Here in this correct mapping, we cannot conclude radiant floor heating, even in the contrapositive!
For Strengthen questions, you must find the weak/weaker part of the premise and add support to it in order to tighten up the loophole!! In this problem, it was the sentence about the hospital study.
With Must Be False questions, the answer is IN THE STIMULUS. You have to be contradicting/picking the AC that CAN NOT be true according to something stated in the stimulus. I always get confused with these questions because when I see an AC that discusses something that wasn't stated in the stimulus, I want to choose it. However, those answers COULD be TRUE, we simply don't know!!
The focus of the salesperson's argument is that there was DIRT LEFT BEHIND (correct AC E), rather than the AMOUNT OF DIRT (incorrect AC D).