User Avatar
smohomed
Joined
Jul 2025
Subscription
Free

Admissions profile

LSAT
Not provided Goal score: 180
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2026

Discussions

User Avatar
smohomed
Edited Saturday, Dec 20 2025

Lifestyle changes, running, excersise, eating healthy, cold showers, passion reading etc might help out, Take care of your brain and body and it will take care of you. but obviously still study. Deep learning dosn't always mean the longer you study the more the more you learn, you can learn alot in a short amount of time but i believe your brain needs to be in its most optimal healthy state for that to occur ie lifestyle changes.

3
User Avatar
smohomed
Friday, Nov 28 2025

@haena Legendary Explanation, It makes perfect sense. Essentially confusing the conditions can happen in numerous ways. Like how it occurs when we confirm the necessary condition aka affirming the consequent like A > B

B.

Therefore A

How many different ways can sufficient condition and the necessary condition be confused, because so far we have two different examples in this chat. Thanks for the reply by the way @haena

2

the following is from a flaw question on seven sage...

Theorist: To be capable of planned locomotion, an organism must be able both to form an internal representation of its environment and to send messages to its muscles to control movements. Such an organism must therefore have a central nervous system. Thus, an organism incapable of planned locomotion does not have a central nervous system.

Correct Answer

  • a

    confuses a necessary condition for an organism's possessing a capacity with a sufficient one

My attempt to identify conditionals (May be False)

( Sufficient condition) be capable of planned locomotion. (Nessesary Condition indicated by must)

an organism must be able to both to form an internal representation of it's environment

and to send messages to its muscles to control movement.

but then what confuses me is what appears to be be another Necessary condition introduced in the subsequent sentence... "Such an organism must therefore have a central nervous system" again another must indicating what appears to be another Necessary condition. Then strangely the argument denys the antecedent aka the sufficient condition when it states " thus an organism incapable of planned locomotion, does not have a central nervous system.

I though confusing the sufficient and necessary condition is exactly like affirming the consequent

A>B

B

therefore A.

Logically valid structure

A>B

A

Therefore B..........

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?