In the phrase "No writer who uses words ambiguously has any reader whose enjoyment depends on attaining a precise understanding of what the writer means."
When we translate this into conditional logic, why is it the R for "reader" that's negated and made necessary?
Shouldn't it be the part of the sentence introduced by "No" that's negated and made necessary? ("writer who uses words ambiguously")
Just wondering if anyone knows how to get the video lessons to stream continuously.
Thanks,
Sonia
0
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
In the phrase "No writer who uses words ambiguously has any reader whose enjoyment depends on attaining a precise understanding of what the writer means."
When we translate this into conditional logic, why is it the R for "reader" that's negated and made necessary?
Shouldn't it be the part of the sentence introduced by "No" that's negated and made necessary? ("writer who uses words ambiguously")