In the phrase "No writer who uses words ambiguously has any reader whose enjoyment depends on attaining a precise understanding of what the writer means."
When we translate this into conditional logic, why is it the R for "reader" that's negated and made necessary?
Shouldn't it be the part of the sentence introduced by "No" that's negated and made necessary? ("writer who uses words ambiguously")
In the phrase "No writer who uses words ambiguously has any reader whose enjoyment depends on attaining a precise understanding of what the writer means."
When we translate this into conditional logic, why is it the R for "reader" that's negated and made necessary?
Shouldn't it be the part of the sentence introduced by "No" that's negated and made necessary? ("writer who uses words ambiguously")