User Avatar
soniaminasian457
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT112.S1.Q22
User Avatar
soniaminasian457
Wednesday, Jul 26 2017

In the phrase "No writer who uses words ambiguously has any reader whose enjoyment depends on attaining a precise understanding of what the writer means."

When we translate this into conditional logic, why is it the R for "reader" that's negated and made necessary?

Shouldn't it be the part of the sentence introduced by "No" that's negated and made necessary? ("writer who uses words ambiguously")

Confirm action

Are you sure?