Subscription pricing
I was completely stuck between C and D.
Was D incorrect because it alluded to incompatibility when government standards are undefined?
#Help
I was completely stuck between C and D.
Was D incorrect because it alluded to incompatibility when government standards are undefined?
#Help
Actually got to E by "do most" contradicting "whose actions, and nothing else". By definition, not implicit, but I'll take it XD.
Q1:
How are Italian Renaissance and "pre-Columbian..." equivalent to trends in modern art?
Got this right initially and wrong on BR as I couldn't justify "trends in modern art".
For beliefs involving true dichotomies/binary cuts that are negative (e.g. I believe there is NOT...), you MUST INEVITABLY accept a new belief in order to reject another.
E.g.
I believe there are no cats in the garden.
[Someone shows me live video footage of cats in the garden]
I do not believe there are no cats in the garden.
BY DEFAULT I MUST NOW BELIEVE THERE ARE SOME CATS IN THE GARDEN.
Any rebuttal of this is even more semantically inane than the above. A is correct. B is correct. Don't regret choosing B. Would do it again.
JY really needs to re-evaluate explanations that dismiss a wrong answer out of hand when the data shows it was more commonly selected than the "correct" answer. I would have loved to hear and be informed by a legitimate explanation as to why the above example does not provide a loophole. Instead, we just get a flippant, "this is just wrong because it says so", when by saying so, it creates room for a contradiction.