#help I have been trying to come up with the best way to approach these RC questions, especially the ones I get wrong. I have reverted back to Phase 1 in the memory method after doing not so well on a few of the RC passages. For the questions you get wrong, how do you go about tackling them? Should I be analyzing the passage on my own then going and watching JY’s analysis to realize what I have missed before I start the question? Should I just power through and then watch his analysis and questions after I do it on my own? I feel like its much harder to correct my way of thinking for RC questions than for the other two sections and not really sure what my “plan of action” should be. Thanks!
PT Questions
stecklerc242
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Hello! Due to a lot of unfortunate circumstances (loss of job, funeral, etc) I have fallen a good few weeks behind on the study schedule. Whenever they explain the study schedule they say if you fall behind you can adjust it but I am not sure how to do that? I am trying to adjust it so its more evenly spread out on what I need to catch up on rather than just overdoing myself and burning out trying to catch up. How do I do this? Thank you!
Hey, so I am a bit confused by the last sentence especially since this is a conditional statement.
The last sentence says: It is almost impossible to make drivers with a larger number of demerit points more responsible drivers
In the question choice A, it mentions only one, drivers with a large number of demerit points and not the driving related offenses to become more responsible.
Since it didn’t include both, in my head I was working with three parties / outcomes
A. Drivers with demerit points
B. Drivers convicted with serious offences
C. Drivers with demerit pts + Convicted serious offences
So given the sentence, I assumed the author meant that only A drivers could not become more responsible drivers not
C drivers could not become more responsible drivers ….
Can someone explain this to me please ?
#help